Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Low-stress Route Learning Using the Lashley III Maze in Mice
Published on: May 22, 2010
MHC-congenic mice (C57BL/6J and B6-H-2K) show differences in speed but not accuracy in learning the Hebb-Williams
Lianne Stanford1, Richard E Brown
1Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4J1.
Abstract:
We compared spatial learning and memory in male and female mice of two MHC-congenic strains (C57BL/6J and B6-H-2K) in two versions of the Hebb-Williams Maze. In the food-reward paradigm, males required fewer sessions to learn than females, but there were no strain differences in acquisition. There were no strain or sex differences in the number of errors during the test phase, but the B6-H-2K mice reached the goal box faster than the C57BL/6J mice. In the water-escape paradigm, the C57BL/6J mice required more sessions than the B6-H-2K mice during acquisition. There were no strain or sex differences in the number of errors or in the latency to swim to the goal box in the test phase of the water-escape task. There were no significant correlations between the number of sessions to learn the two mazes; the number of errors made or the latencies to reach the goal box in each maze. These results indicate that these two strains show differences in performance in the Hebb-Williams Maze, but do not differ in cognitive ability.
More Related Videos
17:45T-maze Forced Alternation and Left-right Discrimination Tasks for Assessing Working and Reference Memory in Mice
Published on: February 26, 2012
14:24An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
Published on: July 29, 2025