Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
A critical study into the fecal analysis routine in practice in Jordan
1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid.
Abstract:
The fecal analysis routine adopted by 21 diagnostic medical laboratories in Jordan was surveyed by the means of a questionnaire filled in by the senior year medical technology students who spent 16 weeks in these laboratories as trainees. The recommended routine fecal analysis was not completed satisfactorily by any of the laboratories surveyed. The wet mount microscopic examination was the sole technical test done for the examination of parasite and ova by the majority of the laboratories, 90% (19 of 21). None of the surveyed laboratories adopted the routine use of a concentration technique. One hundred and eight known positive stool specimens were examined by four qualified medical technologists. The wet mount technique revealed positivity in 53% of specimens only, while the formol-ether sedimentation technique yielded 98-100% positivity. This indicates the value of the formol-ether sedimentation technique over the practiced wet mount technique in the routine fecal analysis.
More Related Videos
08:23Culture Methods to Determine the Limit of Detection and Survival in Transport Media of Campylobacter Jejuni in Human Fecal Specimens
Published on: March 10, 2020
04:57Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
Published on: April 25, 2025