Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

148
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
148
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters01:01

Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

95
It is not uncommon for complete drug pharmacokinetic profiles to remain elusive in pharmacokinetics. This necessitates certain educated assumptions by pharmacokineticists to determine appropriate dosage regimens without comprehensive pharmacokinetic data from animal or human studies. One prevalent assumption is setting the bioavailability factor, denoted as F, to 1 or 100%. This assumption caters to the scenario where a drug doesn't achieve full systemic absorption, resulting in the patient...
95
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.8K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.8K
Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

6.0K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
6.0K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.7K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

326
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
326

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Update from a Randomized Clinical Trial of Limited Versus Extended Dissection.

European urology·2024
Same author

Successful completion of large, low-cost randomized cancer trials at an academic cancer center.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2024
Same author

Testosterone Therapy in Men After Radical Prostatectomy for Low-Intermediate Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer.

The Journal of urology·2024
Same author

Re: Early Prostate Cancer Deaths Among Men with Higher vs Lower Genetic Risk.

European urology·2024
Same author

Transperineal vs Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-The PREVENT Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA oncology·2024
Same author

Clinical utility of an artificial intelligence radiomics-based tool for risk stratification of pulmonary nodules.

JNCI cancer spectrum·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

Underpowering in randomized trials reporting a sample size calculation.

Andrew J Vickers1

  • 1Integrative Medicine Service, Biostatistics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Howard 1312a, 1275 York Avenue, NY 10021, USA. vickersa@mskcc.org

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|September 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Many studies are underpowered because the standard deviations (SDs) used for sample size calculations are smaller than the actual SDs found in the study sample. This leads to inaccurate patient recruitment targets.

More Related Videos

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.1K
Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability
09:11

Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability

Published on: February 23, 2016

22.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.1K
Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability
09:11

Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability

Published on: February 23, 2016

22.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Sample size calculations are crucial for determining the number of participants needed in clinical trials.
  • Inaccurate estimation of standard deviation (SD) can lead to underpowered studies, affecting research validity.
  • Previous research suggests potential discrepancies between predicted and actual SDs in study samples.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether standard deviations (SDs) utilized in sample size calculations are consistently smaller than those observed in the final study samples.
  • To assess the impact of these discrepancies on the power of randomized controlled trials.
  • To identify potential reasons for the underestimation of SDs in sample size planning.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of randomized trials published in four major medical journals was conducted.
  • Predicted standard deviations (SDs) from sample size calculations and actual SDs from study data were extracted for continuous endpoints.
  • Data were analyzed to compare predicted versus observed SDs and to quantify the resulting underestimation of required sample sizes.

Main Results:

  • In 80% of analyzed endpoints, the sample standard deviation (SD) was greater than the predicted SD used in sample size calculations.
  • Approximately 25% of trials required five times the number of patients initially specified in their sample size calculations.
  • This consistent underestimation indicates a significant issue in the planning phase of many clinical trials.

Conclusions:

  • Randomized trials, particularly those with continuous endpoints published in leading medical journals, are frequently underpowered due to inaccurate sample size estimations.
  • There is a lack of understanding regarding the standard deviation (SD) as a random variable, making it difficult to accurately extrapolate from one population to another.
  • Improved methods for estimating SDs and a better grasp of their variability are needed to enhance the reliability of clinical trial power calculations.