Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cage allocation designs for rodent carcinogenicity experiments.

A M Herzberg1, S W Lagakos

  • 1Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Environmental Health Perspectives
|July 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Random effects models for complex designs.

Statistical methods in medical research·2020
Same author

Augmented cross-sectional studies with abbreviated follow-up for estimating HIV incidence.

Biometrics·2011
Same author

Design and analysis of arm-in-cage experiments: inference for three-state progressive disease models with common periodic observation times.

Biometrics·2007
Same author

SARS incubation and quarantine times: when is an exposed individual known to be disease free?

Statistics in medicine·2005
Same author

Covariate analysis of viral eradication studies.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2003
Same author

Estimation of the timing of perinatal transmission of HIV.

Biometrics·2002

This study presents cage allocation designs for rodent carcinogenicity experiments to prevent location-based biases. The proposed designs balance treatment groups by considering cage position, neighbors, and sex for accurate and efficient experimental setups.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Experimental Design
  • Laboratory Animal Science

Background:

  • Rodent carcinogenicity studies are crucial for drug safety evaluation.
  • Cage location can introduce unintended bias in experimental results.
  • Standardized cage allocation is needed to ensure data integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present cage allocation designs for rodent carcinogenicity experiments.
  • To minimize dosage group biases stemming from cage location.
  • To provide practical design solutions for various experimental parameters.

Main Methods:

  • General considerations for selecting cage designs were discussed.
  • Specific designs were developed for 3, 4, and 5 dose groups.
  • Designs accommodate 1, 4, or 5 rodents per cage.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Priorities for balancing treatment groups were identified: horizontal shelf position, rack shelf, nearest neighbor balance, and male-female balance.
  • Designs were created to integrate these balancing criteria.
  • The importance of practical implementation and efficiency was highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • Effective cage allocation designs can mitigate location-based biases in carcinogenicity studies.
  • Balancing multiple factors (position, neighbors, sex) is key to robust experimental design.
  • The proposed designs offer a framework for more reliable rodent study outcomes.