Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: a simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty.

K Ragunath1, L A Thomas, W Y Cheung

  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK. k.ragunath@nottingham.ac.uk

Postgraduate Medical Journal
|September 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ustekinumab for type 1 diabetes in adolescents: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized phase 2 trial.

Nature medicine·2024
Same author

A deep learning system for detection of early Barrett's neoplasia: a model development and validation study.

The Lancet. Digital health·2023
Same author

Safety of the use of gold nanoparticles conjugated with proinsulin peptide and administered by hollow microneedles as an immunotherapy in type 1 diabetes.

Immunotherapy advances·2022
Same author

Real-world Safety of Bevacizumab with First-line Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Population-based Retrospective Cohort Studies in Three Canadian Provinces.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2021
Same author

Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2020
Same author

A catalyst for transforming health systems and person-centred care: Canadian national position statement on patient-reported outcomes.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2020
Same journal

Two cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis with severe ocular involvement treated with adjunctive tofacitinib.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same journal

Diastolic dysfunction and diabetes: the DIADAD study-a retrospective cohort study from Liverpool.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same journal

Care, cash, and proof: forensic accountability for war-related starvation.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same journal

Response to traumatic injuries in polo players in England.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same journal

Aids to venesection and parenteral drug administration in patients with difficult veins.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic reasoning in clinical neurology: a comprehensive primer.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
See all related articles

A new grading scale for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) demonstrated that procedure difficulty impacts trainee success rates. This tool enhances objective evaluation of ERCP outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopic Procedures
  • Medical Device Evaluation

Background:

  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a complex procedure with variable outcomes.
  • Current outcome measures do not account for technical difficulty, limiting objective assessment of operator competence.
  • A standardized grading scale is needed to improve the objectivity of ERCP outcome data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a technical difficulty grading scale for ERCP.
  • To assess the impact of ERCP technical difficulty on procedural success and complication rates, particularly for trainees.
  • To provide a tool for objective evaluation and auditing of ERCP performance.

Main Methods:

  • A 4-grade technical difficulty scale was prospectively applied to all ERCP procedures over 12 months.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Procedures were performed by senior trainees and experienced consultants (trainers).
  • The scale's construct validity and inter-rater reliability were assessed using statistical tests (chi-squared, kappa).

    • Main Results:

    • A total of 305 ERCPs were analyzed, with an overall success rate of 80% and a 4% complication rate.
    • Success rates decreased significantly with increasing technical difficulty (grade I to IV) for trainees (p=0.021).
    • Complications were slightly higher in the most difficult (grade IV) procedures (9%) compared to less difficult ones (4%). Inter-rater reliability was good (kappa=0.68).

    Conclusions:

    • ERCP technical difficulty significantly influences trainee success and complication rates.
    • Incorporating a grading scale into outcome data provides accurate information for qualitative auditing.
    • This grading scale offers a foundation for structured and objective performance evaluation in ERCP.