Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Christopher M Doran1, Marian Shanahan, Richard P Mattick

  • 1National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Sydney, Australia. c.doran@unsw.edu.au

Drug and Alcohol Dependence
|September 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Methadone treatment for opioid dependence was found to be more cost-effective than buprenorphine, though not statistically significant. Both treatments offer viable options for managing opioid use disorder.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interactions of environmentally relevant polyethylene terephthalate (PET) micro-nanoplastics with toxic elements and organic co-pollutants: Chemical corona formation and impact on toxicity and bioavailability during gastrointestinal co-ingestion.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

Erratum: Imaging- and Tumor Biomarker-Based Multivariable Model for Early Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Lifecycle Implications of Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) Micro(nano)plastics (MNPs): Interactions with Coexposed Environmental Pollutants (EPs) and Impact on Their Toxicity and Bioavailability.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Antibiotic-mediated heteroaggregation and sedimentation of nanoplastics with minerals: Mechanisms and environmental implications in natural water.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

Tucatinib-trastuzumab-capecitabine for treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis in women with HER2<sup>+</sup> breast cancer: TBCRC049 phase 2 study results.

Nature cancer·2026
Same author

Prevalence and factors associated with use of prophylaxis for HIV and sexually transmitted infections among sexual health service attendees in England: findings from a cross-sectional observational study.

BMJ public health·2026

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacoeconomics
  • Addiction Medicine
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Opioid dependence is a significant public health issue requiring effective management strategies.
  • Buprenorphine and methadone are commonly used medications for opioid use disorder.
  • Assessing the cost-effectiveness of these treatments is crucial for healthcare policy and resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine versus methadone in treating opioid dependence.
  • To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and economic impact of flexible dosing regimens for these medications.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 405 subjects in two Australian cities.
  • Double-blind assessment of buprenorphine and methadone with flexible, high-dose regimens.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis from a service provider perspective, measuring heroin-free days.
  • Main Results:

    • Methadone treatment was associated with lower costs and greater effectiveness (more heroin-free days) compared to buprenorphine.
    • The observed differences in cost-effectiveness between methadone and buprenorphine were not statistically significant.
    • Buprenorphine was indicated as a viable alternative to methadone.

    Conclusions:

    • While methadone demonstrated a trend towards dominance in cost-effectiveness, buprenorphine remains a clinically relevant and viable treatment option for opioid dependence.
    • Study findings offer valuable policy insights into the comparative costs and outcomes of methadone and buprenorphine treatments.