Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic laparoscopy.

T E Udwadia1

  • 1Department of Minimal Access Surgery P.D., Hinduja National Hospital and Research Centre, and the Department of Surgery, B.D. Petit Parsee General Hospital, Breach Candy Hospital, Mumbai, India. pnd@vsnl.net

Surgical Endoscopy
|September 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breakage of fascial closure device during laparoscopic surgery.

Journal of minimal access surgery·2011
Same author

Laparoscopic biopsy in patients with abdominal lymphadenopathy.

Journal of minimal access surgery·2010
Same author

Cholelithiasis in gallbladder cancer: coincidence, cofactor, or cause!

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2010
Same author

Vacuum-assisted abdominal wall lift for minimal-access surgery: a porcine model study.

Surgical endoscopy·2005
Same author

Low-cost laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1602-1607).

The British journal of surgery·2003
Same author

Nosocomial Mycobacterium chelonac infection in laparoscopic surgery.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2001
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Diagnostic laparoscopy, initiated in 1972, offered a rapid, low-risk method for diagnosing abdominal conditions, improving hospital efficiency. Its role evolved with advanced imaging, now focusing on specific pathologies and laparoscopic treatment planning.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Diagnostic Procedures
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Diagnostic laparoscopy was developed in 1972 in a developing country to expedite diagnosis and improve hospital bed utilization.
  • Initial goals included reducing patient distress and overcoming delays in conventional investigations like X-rays.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of diagnostic laparoscopy over an 18-year period.
  • To assess the diagnostic yield, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness of the procedure.
  • To understand the evolving role of diagnostic laparoscopy in light of advancements in noninvasive imaging.

Main Methods:

  • Over 3,200 diagnostic laparoscopies were performed on adults under local anesthesia between 1972 and 1990.
  • Procedures targeted a wide spectrum of abdominal pathologies, including histologic biopsies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collected included diagnosis rates, complication rates, mortality, and equipment costs.

    • Main Results:

    • The study reported no mortality and a low complication rate of 0.09%.
    • An 84% diagnosis rate was achieved, with 74% of patients undergoing histologic biopsies.
    • The cost per patient was minimal (approximately $0.60), considering equipment amortization.

    Conclusions:

    • Diagnostic laparoscopy proved to be a safe and effective diagnostic tool with high diagnostic yield and low cost.
    • The advent of advanced imaging technologies (ultrasound, CT, MRI) has shifted its role, but it remains valuable for specific indications.
    • Modern diagnostic laparoscopy, enhanced by video cameras and insufflators, is crucial for evaluating liver/peritoneal pathology, tuberculosis, malignancy, acute abdomen, and trauma, often preceding laparoscopic treatment.