Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.

Ming-Te Huang1, Weu Wang, Po-Li Wei

  • 1Department of Surgery, En-Chu-Kong Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. mthuant@yahoo.com.tw

Archives of Surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
|September 10, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) is feasible and safe but takes longer and offers no clear benefits over standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or 5-mm LC. Further technique and instrumentation improvements are needed for MLC adoption.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Authors' reply: From 5C stewardship to measurable perioperative value.

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi·2026
Same author

Integrating quality, risk, and environmental impact in sustainable operating rooms: A perioperative perspective from Taiwan.

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi·2026
Same author

Surgeon educators are infrastructure: Governing surgical training at scale.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Solute Carrier Family 35 A2 (SLC35A2) Promotes Tumor Progression through MYC-Mediated Pathways in Colorectal Cancer.

International journal of medical sciences·2025
Same author

Results of phase Ib/II trial of PEP503 (NBTXR3, radioenhancer) with chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Nanomedicine (London, England)·2025
Same author

Prehabilitation Interventions in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2025

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard for symptomatic gallstones.
  • Advancements in surgical techniques aim to reduce invasiveness and improve patient outcomes.
  • Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) represents a potential refinement in minimally invasive gallbladder removal.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility and safety of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC).
  • To compare the clinical benefits of MLC against standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and 5-mm LC.
  • To evaluate patient outcomes including pain, recovery, and cosmetic results.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective randomized study conducted at a tertiary referral center.

Related Experiment Videos

  • 90 patients with symptomatic gallstones were randomized to MLC, LC, or 5-mm LC.
  • Outcomes measured included operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, pain, complications, and cosmesis.

    • Main Results:

    • MLC required longer operative time but showed no significant differences in blood loss, hospital stay, or complications compared to LC and 5-mm LC.
    • Analgesia requirements were similar between LC and MLC, but higher in the 5-mm LC group.
    • MLC demonstrated reduced pain at the subxyphoid port at 24 hours post-surgery, with comparable cosmetic results at all follow-up points.

    Conclusions:

    • MLC is a feasible and safe procedure for gallstone treatment.
    • However, MLC necessitates increased surgical time and has a higher conversion rate to LC.
    • Currently, MLC offers no significant clinical advantages over LC or 5-mm LC, pending further technical and instrumental advancements.