Related Experiment Videos
Comparison between specific IgE measured by RAST, two chemiluminescent assays and skin prick test
H Mosbech1, N H Nielsen, A Dirksen
1Medical Department TTA, National University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Allergologia Et Immunopathologia
|November 1, 1992
Summary
Three allergy diagnostic assays for specific IgE showed significant differences, particularly at low levels. The chemiluminescent assay (CLA) detected more positive results and correlated well with skin prick testing (SPT).
Area of Science:
- Allergy diagnostics
- Immunology
- In vitro diagnostics
Background:
- Accurate measurement of specific IgE is crucial for diagnosing allergic diseases.
- Multiple in vitro assays exist, but their performance, especially in low-level detection, can vary.
- Comparison of classical radioallergosorbent assay (RAST), chemiluminescent assay (CLA), and immunocheminometric assay (MAGIC LITE SQ) against skin prick testing (SPT) is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of three different specific IgE assays: Phadebas RAST (P-RAST), chemiluminescent assay (CLA), and MAGIC LITE SQ (ML).
- To evaluate the correlation between these assays and skin prick testing (SPT).
- To assess assay sensitivity, particularly in detecting low levels of specific IgE.
Main Methods:
- Two hundred adult allergy patients underwent skin prick testing (SPT) with standardized allergen extracts.
- Specific IgE levels against ten inhalant allergens were measured using P-RAST, CLA, and ML assays.
- Data analysis included frequency distribution, Kendall's rank correlation, and Pearson correlation coefficients.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in specific IgE detection rates were observed: P-RAST (17%), CLA (66%), ML (17%).
- CLA demonstrated a U-shaped distribution, indicating higher sensitivity in detecting both very low and high IgE levels compared to P-RAST and ML.
- High correlations were found between CLA and SPT (r=0.65), including in the low-level IgE subgroup (r=0.60).
Conclusions:
- Marked discrepancies exist between the three specific IgE assays evaluated.
- The CLA system appears more sensitive than P-RAST and ML, especially for low-level specific IgE.
- Further clinical studies are warranted to determine the clinical utility of CLA's enhanced sensitivity.