Related Experiment Videos
Simon-type effects: chronometric evidence for keypress schemata in typewriting
1Department of Psychology, Nashville, Tennessee 73203, USA. gordon.logan@vanderbilt.edu
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|September 12, 2003
Summary
Typing involves internal response representations, or keypress schemata, where keyboard location is key. Reaction times show that stimulus position influences typing speed and internal response coding.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Experimental Psychology
Background:
- Understanding the cognitive processes underlying skilled typing is crucial for human-computer interaction.
- The role of internal representations, or schemata, in motor control and typing remains an area of active research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the chronometric evidence for keypress schemata in typing.
- To determine if stimulus position influences typing reaction times and internal response representations.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments were conducted using chronometric measurements.
- Stimuli (letters and words) were presented at positions displaced from a central fixation point.
- Reaction times were measured based on stimulus presentation and keyboard locations.
Main Results:
- Reaction times were significantly shorter when stimulus positions matched keyboard locations.
- Evidence for parallel activation of keypress schemata was found when typing words.
- No effect of stimulus eccentricity on response-location coding was observed, suggesting categorical coding.
Conclusions:
- Typing involves internal representations (keypress schemata) where keyboard location is a critical component.
- Response-location codes in typing appear to be categorical rather than metric.
- Findings support existing theories of typewriting, such as Rumelhart and Norman's (1982) model.