Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
Effect of selection for growth rate and inheritance on posthatch muscle development in turkeys
S G Velleman1, C S Coy, J W Anderson
1Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA. velleman.1@osu.edu
Abstract:
The inheritance of, and effect of selection for increased BW on, measurements of muscle fibers and extracellular space in turkeys were studied using a randombred control line (RBC2), a subline (F) of RBC2 selected long-term only for increased 16 wk BW, a commercial sire line (B), and reciprocal crosses of the F and B lines. Measures of additive genetic variation were obtained by comparing all of the pure lines or just the large-bodied F and B lines. Estimates of nonadditive genetic variation were obtained by contrasting the average of the reciprocal crosses with the average of the parental lines. A contrast of the reciprocal crosses provided estimates of sex linkage or maternal effects. Samples of pectoralis major muscle were obtained from three males and three females of each genetic group at 1, 4, 8, and 16 wk of age in a manner to avoid muscle contraction. After fixing and cross sectioning, the muscle samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to view muscle morphology. The stained sections were analyzed for muscle fiber width, muscle fiber bundle width (except at 16 wk of age), number of fibers within a 136-microm2 area, and extracellular matrix perimysial (PW) and endomysial (EW) width. Additive genetic variation, as measured by line differences, of measures of muscle fibers and extracellular matrix was a more important source of variation when the RBC2 line was included in the comparison. When all of the pure lines were compared, line differences were significant for fiber bundle width at 4 wk of age; individual fiber width and number of fibers in a given area at 4, 8, and 16 wk of age; PW at all ages; and EW at 1, 8, and 16 wk of age. With the possible exception of PW, nonadditive genetic variation was not an important source of variation for muscle measurements. For PW, the estimates of heterosis were -14.6, 26.4, 14.5, and 17.3% at 1, 4, 8, and 16 wk of age, respectively, but none of the values was significant (P > 0.05). Genetic increases in BW were associated with an increase in muscle fiber width, a smaller number of fibers in a given area, and less extracellular space at older ages. Apparent differences in growth patterns among the genetic groups may have been responsible for the different patterns of change in muscle measurements in the various genetic groups over ages.
More Related Videos
06:38In Ovo Feeding of Commercial Broiler Eggs: An Accurate and Reproducible Method to Affect Muscle Development and Growth
Published on: September 20, 2021
11:41Real Time and Repeated Measurement of Skeletal Muscle Growth in Individual Live Zebrafish Subjected to Altered Electrical Activity
Published on: June 16, 2022