Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimizing the search algorithm for protein engineering by directed evolution.

Richard Fox1, Ajoy Roy, Sridhar Govindarajan

  • 1Maxygen, Inc, 200 Penobscot Drive, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA. richard.fox@maxygen.com

Protein Engineering
|September 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generation of high-expressing transposon-based stable pools to produce (1 + 1) and (2 + 1) bispecific common light chain antibodies.

Biotechnology progress·2026
Same author

Multiplexed antigen panel analysis identifies B cell phenotype and receptor genetic contributions to antibody breadth.

Immunity·2026
Same author

Future scenarios for British biodiversity under climate and land-use change.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A fully implantable intraspinal microstimulation device for early preclinical evaluation of feasibility, stability, and functionality.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Trait mediation explains decadal distributional shifts for a wide range of insect taxa.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Electrochemical behavior and biocompatibility of TiO<sub>2</sub>@C core-shell NWs deposited by PECVD for cellular interface application.

RSC advances·2025
Same journal

Structure of a human Rhinovirus complexed with its receptor molecule.

Protein engineering·2024
Same journal

pH-responsive polymer-assisted refolding of urea- and organic solvent-denatured alpha-chymotrypsin.

Protein engineering·2004
Same journal

Evaluation of different linker regions for multimerization and coupling chemistry for immobilization of a proteinaceous affinity ligand.

Protein engineering·2004
Same journal

Recombinant porcine intestinal carboxylesterase: cloning from the pig liver esterase gene by site-directed mutagenesis, functional expression and characterization.

Protein engineering·2004
Same journal

Periplasmic expression of human growth hormone via plasmid vectors containing the lambdaPL promoter: use of HPLC for product quantification.

Protein engineering·2004
Same journal

Shift of fibril-forming ability of the designed alpha-helical coiled-coil peptides into the physiological pH region.

Protein engineering·2004
See all related articles

This study compares directed evolution search strategies using an in silico protein model. The ProSAR algorithm shows superior performance over genetic algorithms, especially in predicting protein activity with varying coupling.

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Protein engineering
  • Directed evolution

Background:

  • Directed evolution aims to optimize protein function through iterative cycles of mutation and selection.
  • In silico models provide a powerful tool for comparing different search strategies before experimental implementation.
  • The Kauffman NK-landscape model offers a framework for understanding protein sequence space.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of a genetic algorithm (GA) representing DNA shuffling with the ProSAR algorithm for directed evolution.
  • To investigate the impact of parameters like coupling (K), screening size, noise, and replicates on search strategy performance.
  • To evaluate the predictive accuracy and robustness of the ProSAR algorithm in protein engineering.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized an in silico protein model based on the Kauffman NK-landscape.
  • Modeled DNA shuffling performance using a genetic algorithm (GA).
  • Employed the ProSAR algorithm, involving model building and library design, for comparison.

Main Results:

  • The ProSAR algorithm accurately predicted protein activities for low amino acid coupling (K ≤ 1).
  • ProSAR demonstrated robust performance across small to moderate coupling values (0 ≤ K ≤ 3) and was resilient to system noise.
  • GA performance, modeling standard DNA shuffling, was also assessed against ProSAR.

Conclusions:

  • The ProSAR algorithm is a promising strategy for enhancing directed evolution efficiency in protein engineering.
  • Understanding the degree of amino acid coupling is crucial for selecting optimal search strategies.
  • In silico modeling aids in the rational design of protein engineering experiments.