Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Factors Affecting Illness01:18

Factors Affecting Illness

When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient01:17

Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient

The extended Debye-Hückel equation indicates that the activity coefficient of an ion in an aqueous solution at 25°C depends on three partially interdependent properties: the ionic strength of the solution, the charge of the ion, and the ion size. 
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a decrease in the...
Impact01:30

Impact

Impact occurs when two bodies collide, leading to the application of impulsive forces between them. Analyzing impact mechanics involves considering two colliding particles moving along a line known as the line of impact, which passes through their centers and is perpendicular to the contact plane.
When particles with different initial velocities collide, they induce deformation by applying equal and opposite impulses. At the point of maximum deformation, the particles move together with...
Types of Impact01:30

Types of Impact

Impacts can be classified in various forms, primarily under two subgroups: central impact and oblique impact. A central impact occurs when two objects collide head-on, possessing opposite velocities aligned along the line of impact. Conversely, an oblique impact occurs when two objects collide at an angle, resulting in a modification of both direction and velocity.
The coefficient of restitution is a metric for understanding the dynamics of impacts. It quantifies the ratio of relative velocity...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Magnetic resonance images of reactive lymphadenitis.

Lymphology·2006
Same author

What is the role of MR imaging in acute skeletal trauma?

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

PowerPointing.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

PACS: radiology in the digital world.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

Radiation exposure in CT: why so high?

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

Serious business: radiation safety and radiation protection.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Predicting Catalyst Extrudate Breakage Based on the Modulus of Rupture
09:53

Predicting Catalyst Extrudate Breakage Based on the Modulus of Rupture

Published on: May 13, 2018

Impact Factor: myths and realities.

L F Rogers1

  • 1Wake Forest University School of Medicine, USA. lrogers@ajroffice.org

Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
|September 13, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Impact Factor, a metric for journal quality, is widely used by authors and institutions. However, its validity for evaluating researchers and departments is questionable.

More Related Videos

Application of Unsupervised Multi-Omic Factor Analysis to Uncover Patterns of Variation and Molecular Processes Linked to Cardiovascular Disease
08:51

Application of Unsupervised Multi-Omic Factor Analysis to Uncover Patterns of Variation and Molecular Processes Linked to Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: September 20, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Predicting Catalyst Extrudate Breakage Based on the Modulus of Rupture
09:53

Predicting Catalyst Extrudate Breakage Based on the Modulus of Rupture

Published on: May 13, 2018

Application of Unsupervised Multi-Omic Factor Analysis to Uncover Patterns of Variation and Molecular Processes Linked to Cardiovascular Disease
08:51

Application of Unsupervised Multi-Omic Factor Analysis to Uncover Patterns of Variation and Molecular Processes Linked to Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: September 20, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scientific publishing
  • Research assessment

Background:

  • The Impact Factor (IF) was created to assess scientific journal quality.
  • Its use has expanded beyond its original intent, influencing author submissions and institutional evaluations.
  • The IF has gained significant, almost mythical, status in academia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the widespread application of the Impact Factor.
  • To question the validity of using the IF for evaluating individual faculty and departmental performance.
  • To highlight the overreliance on the IF in academic settings.

Main Methods:

  • This study is a critical review of the current practices surrounding the Impact Factor.
  • It analyzes the origins and evolution of the Impact Factor's use.
  • It discusses the implications of its widespread adoption in research assessment.

Main Results:

  • The Impact Factor is extensively used by authors when selecting journals for publication.
  • Academic institutions, including deans and administrators, employ the IF to judge faculty and departmental quality.
  • Departmental funding and budgets are often determined by the journal's Impact Factor.

Conclusions:

  • Serious concerns exist regarding the appropriateness of using the Impact Factor for evaluating academic productivity and quality.
  • The current application of the IF may not accurately reflect the true value of scientific contributions.
  • Rethinking the reliance on the Impact Factor for critical academic decisions is necessary.