Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026

Accurate Follicle Enumeration in Adult Mouse Ovaries
Published on: October 16, 2020
Reproductive aging and variability in the ovarian antral follicle count: application in the clinical setting
Karl R Hansen1, Jamie L Morris, Angela C Thyer
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA. krhansen@u.wahsington.edu
Objective:
To determine the extent of intercycle and interobserver variability in antral follicle (AF) count and their impact on stimulation quality in IVF.
Design:
Prospective evaluation of the impact on AF count of GnRH agonist down-regulation and interobserver variability. Retrospective evaluation of intercycle variability in AF count.
Setting:
University ART clinic.
Patient(S):
Twenty subjects were used to evaluate the effect of GnRH agonist down-regulation upon AF count; six of whom were used to evaluate interobserver variability. Fifty patients experiencing two or three cycles of IVF within a 1-year interval.
Intervention(S):
Transvaginal ultrasound exams before and after down-regulation with a GnRH agonist. Videotaped day-3 transvaginal ultrasound exams.
Main Outcome Measure(S):
[1] Intercycle and interobserver variability in antral follicle count. [2] Oocytes retrieved, peak estradiol, gonadotropin dose, duration of stimulation and cancellation rates.
Result(S):
There is moderate intercycle and interobserver variability in AF counts. GnRH agonist down-regulation does not significantly change AF count. In infertility patients undergoing IVF, paired analysis between the low- and high-AF count cycles did not show a difference in quality of stimulation or cycle cancellation rates.
Conclusions:
Within an individual patient, higher AF count in a given cycle was not predictive of better stimulation compared with the case of a lower count cycle.
Related Concept Videos
Oogenesis
Menopause
Folliculogenesis
Nondisjunction
Ovarian Cycle

