Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of directed evolution approaches using the beta-glucuronidase model system.

Lori A Rowe1, Melissa L Geddie, Omar B Alexander

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Journal of Molecular Biology
|September 16, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Flush With Data (or) Optimizing and Validating the Efficacy of Free and Computationally Simple 16S Metabarcoding Approaches for Use in Wastewater Surveillance.

Environmental microbiology·2026
Same author

Gastrointestinal Mucosal Disruptions During ART-Treated SIV<i>/Plasmodium fragile</i> Co-Infection.

Pathogens & immunity·2026
Same author

RhCMV expands CCR5+ memory T cells and promotes SIV reservoir seeding in the gut mucosa.

JCI insight·2025
Same author

Building a potent TREM2 agonistic, biparatopic, common light chain antibody.

mAbs·2025
Same author

Distinct transcriptomic signatures in pulmonary tissue resident and vascular resident-like T cells in nonhuman primates.

iScience·2025
Same author

Inflammatory neutrophil responses and T cell activation in ART-treated SIVmac239-infected rhesus macaques.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2025

Protein engineers can evolve enzymes using various methods. Recombinational approaches like DNA shuffling accelerate enzyme evolution by accumulating beneficial mutations, outperforming asexual methods.

Area of Science:

  • Protein engineering
  • Enzyme evolution
  • Directed evolution

Background:

  • Experimental evolution is a powerful tool for altering enzyme properties.
  • Previous work utilized DNA shuffling and histochemical screening for enzyme evolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficiencies of different mutagenesis and screening techniques in protein engineering.
  • To investigate the impact of asexual vs. recombinational evolution on beneficial mutation fixation.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a model system using Escherichia coli beta-glucuronidase (GUS) evolution.
  • Tested recursive random mutagenesis (asexual), combinatorial cassette mutagenesis (recombination), and a high-throughput microplate screen.
  • Compared results with previous DNA shuffling and X-gal colony screening.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All tested methods evolved GUS variants with altered specificity.
  • The microplate screen identified a wider range of mutations than colony screening.
  • Recombinational methods (DNA shuffling, combinatorial mutagenesis) facilitated beneficial mutation accumulation, unlike asexual mutagenesis which suffered clonal interference.

Conclusions:

  • Different mutagenesis and screening combinations lead to distinct evolutionary outcomes.
  • Recombinational strategies are more efficient for laboratory evolution due to superior accumulation of beneficial mutations.
  • Understanding these dynamics enhances protein engineering strategies.