Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contour integration in peripheral vision reduces gradually with eccentricity.

Alex K Nugent1, Rajesh N Keswani, Russell L Woods

  • 1The Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114-2500, USA.

Vision Research
|September 16, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes of Surveillance Program for Individuals at High-Risk of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Pancreas·2026
Same author

A randomized crossover clinical trial of multi-periscopic and Fresnel peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same author

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Abnormal Findings on Pre-Diagnostic Imaging in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Pancreas·2026
Same author

Correction to: Multi-center evaluation of radiomics and deep learning to stratify malignancy risk of IPMNs.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2026
Same author

Uncertainty-Aware Explainable AI for Pancreatic Cysts: Identifying Deep Learning Vulnerabilities and Ensuring Safe Clinical Triage in IPMN Management.

Research square·2026
Same author

External Validation of an AI-Based Colonoscopy Quality Assessment Tool in Japanese Clinical Practice: A Pilot Study.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2026
Same journal

Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Normally-sighted individuals can detect alternating-phase Gabor paths in peripheral vision, challenging previous findings. Central and peripheral vision likely use similar mechanisms for path detection.

Area of Science:

  • Vision science
  • Perceptual psychology

Background:

  • Previous research suggested distinct central and peripheral visual processing mechanisms.
  • Hess and Dakin (1997) reported normally-sighted subjects could not detect alternating-phase Gabor paths in peripheral vision.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the detectability of alternating-phase Gabor paths in peripheral vision.
  • To compare visual processing mechanisms between central and peripheral vision.

Main Methods:

  • Replication of Hess and Dakin's (1997) experiments with normally-sighted observers.
  • Path detection measured as a function of visual eccentricity (0-30 degrees).
  • Testing individuals with central vision loss using eccentric viewing.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Normally-sighted observers could detect alternating-phase Gabor paths beyond 10 degrees eccentricity.
  • Path detection decreased monotonically with increasing eccentricity for both stimulus types.
  • Individuals with central vision loss could detect both same- and alternating-phase stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • Contrary to previous findings, central and peripheral vision appear to utilize similar mechanisms for Gabor path detection.
  • The proposed "fundamental difference" between central and peripheral visual processing for this task is not supported.
  • Eccentric viewing capabilities are consistent across individuals with normal and impaired central vision.