Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visible persistence is reduced by fixed-trajectory motion but not by random motion.

S N Watamaniuk1

  • 1Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94115.

Perception
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Moving objects appear clear due to reduced visible persistence. This study shows that consistent motion, not just proximity, specifically reduces persistence by activating motion mechanisms.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The use of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds.

Vision research·2000
Same author

Local motion detectors cannot account for the detectability of an extended trajectory in noise.

Vision research·1999
Same author

Human smooth pursuit direction discrimination.

Vision research·1999
Same author

Visual search for motion-in-depth: stereomotion does not 'pop out' from disparity noise.

Nature neuroscience·1999
Same author

Spatial integration in human smooth pursuit.

Vision research·1999
Same author

Simultaneous encoding of direction at a local and global scale.

Perception & psychophysics·1998

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The human visual system has a slow temporal response, yet moving objects are perceived clearly.
  • Visible persistence, the duration visual stimuli remain in perception, is thought to be reduced by object motion.
  • Previous theories attributed this reduction solely to spatiotemporal proximity, not motion processing itself.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether motion processing, independent of spatiotemporal proximity, influences visible persistence.
  • To determine if a motion-specific mechanism modulates visible persistence.
  • To test if directionally tuned motion mechanisms are involved in persistence suppression.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of visible persistence for points moving in fixed trajectories versus random walks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants estimated the number of points in displays under different motion conditions.
  • Experimental conditions were optimized for 'good' apparent motion (small spatial and temporal increments).

    • Main Results:

    • Points moving in fixed directions showed significantly less visible persistence than those on random walks.
    • This effect was observed even when spatial and temporal displacements were identical between conditions.
    • The results contradict explanations based solely on spatiotemporal proximity.

    Conclusions:

    • Visible persistence is specifically modulated by motion processing, not just object proximity.
    • Consistent directional motion enhances the suppression of visible persistence.
    • This enhanced suppression relies on the activation of directionally tuned motion mechanisms.