Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial orientation in weightless environments.

J R Lackner1

  • 1Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254.

Perception
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The oculogyral illusion: retinal and oculomotor factors.

Experimental brain research·2011
Same author

Influence of multisensory graviceptive information on the apparent zenith.

Experimental brain research·2010
Same author

Pursuit eye movements elicited by muscle afferent information.

Neuroscience letters·2009
Same author

Smooth pursuit eye movements elicited by somatosensory stimulation.

Neuroscience letters·2009
Same author

Visual direction depends on the operation of spatial constancy mechanisms: the oculobrachial illusion.

Neuroscience letters·2009
Same author

Influence of gravitoinertial force level on the subjective vertical during recumbent yaw axis body tilt.

Experimental brain research·2007
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Astronauts can experience illusions of self and vehicle inversion in microgravity. Cognitive factors and sensory cues significantly influence spatial orientation during spaceflight.

Area of Science:

  • Space medicine
  • Human physiology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Spaceflight and microgravity can induce disorientation and illusions of body inversion.
  • Understanding spatial orientation is crucial for astronaut safety and performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the nature of body and vehicle inversion illusions in microgravity.
  • To explore the sensory and cognitive factors influencing spatial orientation during spaceflight.

Main Methods:

  • Exposure to microgravity conditions via orbital and parabolic flight.
  • Observation of self- and vehicle-inversion illusions under varying sensory conditions.
  • Analysis of the influence of visual cues, touch, pressure, and cognitive factors on orientation.
Keywords:
NASA Discipline NeuroscienceNon-NASA Center

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Illusions of body and vehicle inversion occur in multiple combinations during weightlessness.
  • In the absence of external stimuli, a sense of body orientation can be lost, though body configuration awareness remains.
  • Visual input, gaze direction, vehicle architecture, and body visibility significantly affect perceived orientation.
  • The impact of different orientation factors changes with repeated exposure to microgravity.
  • The lack of falling sensations in free-fall highlights the role of cognitive processes in orientation.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial orientation in microgravity is a complex interplay of sensory inputs and cognitive processing.
  • Visual and non-visual cues, along with cognitive strategies, are essential for maintaining orientation during spaceflight.
  • Further research into these factors can inform strategies to mitigate disorientation for astronauts.