Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The United Kingdom: effective, efficient, equitable?

A J Culyer¹, A Meads

¹University of York.

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

|January 1, 1992

Summary

The British National Health Service (NHS) aimed for universal healthcare access and equitable resource distribution. Recent reforms introducing competition may risk care quality and access despite efficiency goals.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Nice's Proposed Value-Based Assessment of Health Technologies: Concerns of Inconsistent Consideration of Social Values.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016

Same author

Not a NICE fallacy: a reply to Dr Quigley.

Journal of medical ethics·2008

Same author

Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE's decisions.

Journal of medical ethics·2006

Same author

Economics and ethics in health care.

Journal of medical ethics·2001

Same author

Equity - some theory and its policy implications.

Journal of medical ethics·2001

Same author

Morbidity associated with gastrostomy placement in children demands an ongoing integrated approach to care.

The New Zealand medical journal·2001

Area of Science:

Health policy
Healthcare management
Public health systems

Background:

The British National Health Service (NHS) was established to provide universal healthcare access irrespective of income.
Historically, the NHS maintained lower healthcare costs relative to GDP compared to many Western nations, ensuring equitable regional resource distribution.
Prior to the 1989 White Paper reforms, the NHS operated with centralized financing and regulation, enjoying public popularity despite some care delivery challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the potential impact of reforms aimed at enhancing NHS efficiency through competition and decentralization.
To assess the likelihood of proposed reforms achieving desired outcomes in the UK healthcare system.

Main Methods:

Analysis of the historical structure and performance of the NHS.
Examination of the theoretical underpinnings and anticipated effects of the 1989 White Paper reforms.
Critical review of potential unintended consequences of market-based healthcare reforms.

Main Results:

The NHS has historically succeeded in providing equitable access and managing costs effectively.
Reforms introducing competition and decentralization carry uncertain outcomes.
Potential negative consequences include increased initial costs, unpredictable public response to incentives, and possible deterioration in care quality and access.

Conclusions:

The proposed NHS reforms, while aiming for efficiency, present significant risks.
The effectiveness of competition and decentralization in improving UK healthcare remains unproven.
Nations considering the UK model for healthcare reform should proceed with caution due to potential adverse effects.

Related Experiment Videos