Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Propofol and methohexitone for elective caesarean--a comparative study.

A F Miranda1, W Kyi, N Sivalingam

  • 1Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Johor Bahru, Johor.

The Medical Journal of Malaysia
|December 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Propofol induction for caesarean sections resulted in more stable blood pressure and reduced post-operative pain compared to methohexitone. Both anesthetics were safe for mothers and newborns.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Palliative care in Malaysia: the need to do much more.

The Medical journal of Malaysia·2021
Same author

Writing Articles on Continuing Medical Education for Medical Journals.

The Medical journal of Malaysia·2021
Same author

Incidence of vaginal erosion with different synthetic materials for suburethral sling in the treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A systematic review.

The Medical journal of Malaysia·2018
Same author

Views of faculty members in a medical school with regards to error disclosure and reporting to parents and/or higher authorities.

The Medical journal of Malaysia·2017
Same author

Parental preferences with regards to disclosure following adverse events occurring in relation to medication use or diagnosis in the care of their children - perspectives from Malaysia.

The Medical journal of Malaysia·2016
Same author

Strategic Interventions in the Management of Gestational Diabetes to Reduce Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Women in Malaysia.

The Medical journal of Malaysia·2015
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Obstetrics
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Caesarean sections require effective anesthesia with minimal maternal and neonatal compromise.
  • Propofol and methohexitone are intravenous induction agents used in anesthesia.
  • Comparing their efficacy and safety in obstetric patients is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the hemodynamic effects of propofol versus methohexitone for caesarean section induction.
  • To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes, including pain and Apgar scores.
  • To assess the need for postoperative analgesia.

Main Methods:

  • Two identical groups of females undergoing caesarean operations were studied.
  • One group received propofol (2.04 mg/kg), the other methohexitone (1.05 mg/kg) for induction.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Anesthesia maintenance was identical; outcomes were compared.

    • Main Results:

    • Propofol induction showed no significant changes in post-intubation blood pressure, unlike methohexitone.
    • No significant differences were observed in Apgar scores, uterine contractility, or blood gases.
    • Patients in the propofol group required less postoperative analgesia.

    Conclusions:

    • Propofol offers superior hemodynamic stability and better postoperative pain control compared to methohexitone for caesarean delivery.
    • Both agents demonstrated safety with no maternal awareness or adverse neonatal effects.