[How to evaluate the arrhythmogenic risk after myocardial infarction?]

The risk of sudden arrhythmic death after myocardial infarction is high, especially during the first months. The evaluation of this risk should be performed before hospital discharge in the same way as residual ischaemia and left ventricular function, which are independent risk factors for arrhythmia, are assessed. Holter monitoring provides information not only about ventricular hyperexcitability (especially the detection of unsustained ventricular tachycardia) but also about the activity of the autonomic nervous system by analysis of variations of the sinus rhythm, the decrease of which carries a poor prognosis. The search for an arrhythmogenic substrate requires signal averaged electrocardiography, but although the absence of late potentials carries a good prognosis, the positive predictive value of this investigation is very low. The association of non-invasive indices of poor prognosis greatly increases the probability of a major arrhythmic event; this may require consideration of programmed ventricular pacing, another method of substrate and risk assessment, which has the added advantage of sometimes indicating the most appropriate therapy.