Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Drowning.

R Sarvesvaran1

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

The Malaysian Journal of Pathology
|December 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Finding a body in water doesn't automatically mean drowning caused death. This study explores drowning diagnosis, highlighting the importance of diatom and biochemical tests for accurate determination.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The examination of skeletal remains.

The Malaysian journal of pathology·1994
Same author

Solvent abuse: a case report and a review.

The Malaysian journal of pathology·1994
Same author

Acquired tracheo-oesophageal fistula following tracheal intubation in a burned patient.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·1993
Same author

Strychnine poisoning: a case report.

The Malaysian journal of pathology·1992
Same author

Medico-legal aspects of embolism with a case illustration.

The Malaysian journal of pathology·1991
Same author

Suicide or homicide?

Acta medicinae legalis et socialis·1986

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Pathology
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Determining the cause of death in cases involving bodies recovered from water presents diagnostic challenges.
  • Drowning is a common cause of accidental death, but its diagnosis can be complex.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the diagnostic criteria for drowning.
  • To evaluate the significance of specific tests in confirming drowning as the cause of death.

Main Methods:

  • Review of diagnostic approaches for drowning.
  • Analysis of the utility of diatom testing in forensic investigations.
  • Assessment of biochemical markers in post-mortem analysis.

Main Results:

  • The presence of a body in water is not sufficient evidence for a drowning diagnosis.
  • Diatom tests and biochemical analyses are crucial for supporting a drowning diagnosis.
  • These tests help differentiate drowning from other causes of death.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate diagnosis of drowning requires a comprehensive approach beyond simply recovering a body from water.
  • Diatom and biochemical tests are indispensable tools in forensic pathology for confirming drowning.

Related Experiment Videos