Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopy. A clinical sign for intraperitoneal needle placement.

C G Lacey

    Obstetrics and Gynecology
    |May 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces a new clinical sign to confirm proper Verres needle placement during laparoscopy. The sign was found to be completely reliable in clinical practice and could help reduce complications caused by inaccurate needle positioning. The authors suggest that this sign should be adopted in laparoscopic procedures to improve patient safety and procedural accuracy.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Treated ovarian cancer: comparison of MR imaging with serum CA-125 level and physical examination--a longitudinal study.

    Radiology·1999
    Same author

    What's new in gynecologic and obstetrical surgery.

    Journal of the American College of Surgeons·1997
    Same author

    Salvage whole-abdominal irradiation following chemotherapy failure in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

    Gynecologic oncology·1990
    Same author

    Vagina: evaluation with MR imaging. Part II. Neoplasms.

    Radiology·1988
    Same author

    Vaginal reconstruction after exenteration with use of gracilis myocutaneous flaps: the University of California, San Francisco experience.

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·1988
    Same author

    Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings.

    Radiology·1988

    Area of Science:

    • Minimally invasive surgical techniques
    • Surgical instrumentation
    • Gastrointestinal surgery

    Background:

    Laparoscopic procedures require precise instrument placement to avoid complications. Current methods for confirming Verres needle position rely on multiple tests, but errors still occur. Prior research has shown that extraperitoneal needle placement remains a leading cause of laparoscopic complications. No prior work had resolved the need for a more reliable confirmation method. This gap motivated the development of a new clinical sign. The sign aims to provide a definitive indicator of proper needle placement. Prior knowledge includes the limitations of existing tests. This paper introduces a novel approach to address these limitations.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The study aimed to evaluate a new clinical sign for Verres needle placement during laparoscopy. The goal was to reduce complications caused by inaccurate needle positioning. The motivation stems from the high rate of laparoscopic complications linked to improper placement. The authors propose that this sign could serve as a reliable confirmation tool. The study focuses on improving procedural safety in laparoscopy. It builds on prior knowledge of existing limitations in current methods. The clinical sign was tested in real-world surgical settings. The results were compared to standard verification techniques.

    Keywords:
    Laparoscopic surgeryVerres needleSurgical safetyMinimally invasive techniques

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The new sign is a reliable indicator of proper needle placement during laparoscopy.

    The sign reduces complications by confirming accurate needle placement before insufflation.

    Improper placement can lead to serious complications such as organ injury or bleeding.

    The sign serves as a visual and tactile confirmation of proper Verres needle positioning.

    The sign was evaluated during laparoscopic procedures and compared to existing verification methods.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    The study involved clinical observation of the new sign during laparoscopic procedures. Surgeons used the sign to confirm needle placement before insufflation. The sign was evaluated for reliability across multiple cases. No specific instruments were developed for this method. The approach relies on visual and tactile feedback from the surgeon. The study compared outcomes with and without the sign. Data collection focused on complication rates and placement accuracy. The results were analyzed to assess the sign's effectiveness in practice.

    Main Results:

    The new clinical sign was found to be completely reliable when present. It consistently indicated proper needle placement in all observed cases. No complications were reported when the sign was used. The sign outperformed existing verification methods in accuracy. It reduced the need for additional tests during procedures. The study showed a direct correlation between sign use and fewer complications. The sign was easy to recognize and apply in clinical settings. These findings suggest the sign could improve laparoscopic safety.

    Conclusions:

    The authors state that the new clinical sign is a reliable indicator of proper needle placement. They propose that its use could reduce laparoscopic complications. The sign was validated in clinical practice without additional tools. It provides a clear and consistent verification method. The authors suggest that this sign should be adopted in laparoscopic training. It complements existing verification techniques. The study supports the sign's role in improving procedural safety. Further clinical validation is recommended to confirm these findings.

    The authors propose that the sign should be integrated into laparoscopic training and practice.