Cytomegalovirus infections in allogeneic stem cell recipients after reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning

J Schetelig1, O Oswald, N Steuer

  • 1Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Medizinische Klinik m.S. Hämatologie und Onkologie, Berlin, Germany.

Bone Marrow Transplantation
|September 18, 2003
PubMed

Insights

Reduced-intensity conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) did not significantly alter cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection rates compared to myeloablative conditioning. CMV seropositivity and graft-versus-host disease were key risk factors for CMV antigenemia.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Transplantation Immunology

Background:

  • Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are a significant complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
  • The intensity of pre-transplant conditioning regimens may influence the incidence of CMV infections post-HSCT.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the incidence and kinetics of CMV infections after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) versus myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in HSCT recipients.
  • To identify risk factors for CMV antigenemia in HSCT patients.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective monitoring of 82 patients undergoing HSCT with either RIC (fludarabine, busulfan, ATG) or MAC.
  • Utilized CMV-PCR, CMV-antigenemia assays, and clinical observation for CMV detection.
  • Multivariate analysis to assess risk factors for CMV antigenemia.

Main Results:

  • Leukocyte and platelet engraftment were faster in the RIC group compared to the MAC group.
  • The incidence, onset, and peak values of CMV antigenemia and DNAemia did not differ significantly between RIC and MAC groups.
  • CMV seropositivity in recipients and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV were significant risk factors for CMV antigenemia, but conditioning intensity was not.

Conclusions:

  • Reduced-intensity conditioning does not statistically alter the incidence or kinetics of CMV infections post-HSCT compared to myeloablative conditioning.
  • CMV seropositivity and acute GVHD are significant predictors of CMV antigenemia, highlighting the importance of recipient factors and immune status.