Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2026

Generation of Multivirus-specific T Cells to Prevent/treat Viral Infections after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Published on: May 27, 2011
Cytomegalovirus infections in allogeneic stem cell recipients after reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning
J Schetelig1, O Oswald, N Steuer
1Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Medizinische Klinik m.S. Hämatologie und Onkologie, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract:
Since the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may depend on the intensity of the pretreatment, we studied the incidence of CMV infections after reduced-intensity compared to myeloablative conditioning. A total of 82 patients with matched related or unrelated donors were prospectively monitored for CMV infections after HSCT by CMV-PCR techniques, CMV-antigenemia and clinical observation. A total of 45 patients received reduced-intensity conditioning consisting of fludarabine, busulfan and ATG and 37 patients received myeloablative conditioning. Leukocyte engraftment occurred after a median of 15 vs 18 days (P=0.012) and platelet engraftment after 12 days vs 20 days (P=0.001), respectively. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV was observed in 58 vs 54% patients (P=0.737), respectively. The onset and peak values of CMV-antigenemia and DNAemia and the incidence of CMV infections did not differ statistically significantly between the two treatment groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed CMV seropositivity of the recipient (P=0.035), acute GVHD II-IV (P=0.001) but not the type of conditioning as significant risk factors for CMV-antigenemia. In conclusion, the kinetics of CMV-antigenemia and DNAemia and the incidence of CMV infections were not statistically different in patients who received HSCT after reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan and ATG compared to myeloablative conditioning.
Insights
Reduced-intensity conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) did not significantly alter cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection rates compared to myeloablative conditioning. CMV seropositivity and graft-versus-host disease were key risk factors for CMV antigenemia.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Infectious Diseases
- Transplantation Immunology
Background:
- Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are a significant complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
- The intensity of pre-transplant conditioning regimens may influence the incidence of CMV infections post-HSCT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence and kinetics of CMV infections after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) versus myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in HSCT recipients.
- To identify risk factors for CMV antigenemia in HSCT patients.
Main Methods:
- Prospective monitoring of 82 patients undergoing HSCT with either RIC (fludarabine, busulfan, ATG) or MAC.
- Utilized CMV-PCR, CMV-antigenemia assays, and clinical observation for CMV detection.
- Multivariate analysis to assess risk factors for CMV antigenemia.
Main Results:
- Leukocyte and platelet engraftment were faster in the RIC group compared to the MAC group.
- The incidence, onset, and peak values of CMV antigenemia and DNAemia did not differ significantly between RIC and MAC groups.
- CMV seropositivity in recipients and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV were significant risk factors for CMV antigenemia, but conditioning intensity was not.
Conclusions:
- Reduced-intensity conditioning does not statistically alter the incidence or kinetics of CMV infections post-HSCT compared to myeloablative conditioning.
- CMV seropositivity and acute GVHD are significant predictors of CMV antigenemia, highlighting the importance of recipient factors and immune status.
More Related Videos
10:24Automated Cell Enrichment of Cytomegalovirus-specific T cells for Clinical Applications using the Cytokine-capture System
Published on: October 5, 2015
11:18Expanding Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes from Umbilical Cord Blood that Target Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr Virus, and Adenovirus
Published on: May 7, 2012