Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preventive strategies against poliomyelitis.

T A Swartz1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Sackler School of Medicine, Israel.

Vaccine
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Polio prevention strategies must consider infection epidemiology and population immunity. Combining oral polio vaccine (OPV) and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) offers advantages for polio control and elimination.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early results of an extensive rubella epidemic.

International journal of epidemiology·2013
Same author

Intestinal immunity following a combined enhanced inactivated polio vaccine/oral polio vaccine programme in Israel.

Vaccine·2008
Same author

Immune response to a diphtheria and tetanus toxoid administration in a three-dose diphtheria tetanus whole-cell pertussis/enhanced inactivated poliovirus vaccination schedule: a 7-year follow up.

European journal of epidemiology·2003
Same author

Influenza surveillance during winter 1997-1998 in Israel.

The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ·2002
Same author

Immune response to an intercalated enhanced inactivated polio vaccine/oral polio vaccine programme in Israel: impact on the control of poliomyelitis.

Vaccine·1998
Same author

Progress in polio eradication.

Lancet (London, England)·1993

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Immunology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Poliomyelitis prevention is contingent upon understanding infection dynamics and population immunity.
  • Current polio vaccines offer potential for control if programs are well-designed and vaccine limitations are acknowledged.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of different polio prevention strategies.
  • To assess the role of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in polio control and eradication.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of epidemiological data related to poliomyelitis.
  • Review of current polio vaccination programs and vaccine characteristics.
  • Evaluation of the advantages and limitations of OPV and IPV.

Main Results:

  • Polio prevention success relies on epidemiological factors and population immune status.
  • Both OPV and IPV can achieve containment and local elimination of paralytic poliomyelitis.
  • Combining OPV and IPV presents a significant advantage over monovalent vaccination, especially over OPV alone.
  • Vaccine-associated disease remains a challenge in OPV programs.

Conclusions:

  • Polio prevention programs require careful selection and consideration of vaccine limitations.
  • Containment and local elimination are achievable goals with current vaccines.
  • Global polio eradication faces challenges due to the widespread nature of the infection and global development disparities.
  • Combined OPV and IPV immunization strategies are recommended for enhanced polio control.

Related Experiment Videos