Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dissociated hemispheric and stimulus effects upon affective choice and recognition.

T Landis1, L Christen, R Graves

  • 1Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.

The International Journal of Neuroscience
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Subliminal face presentations affected affective choices, while supraliminal word presentations influenced affective judgments. Recognition was unaffected, suggesting affective and recognition processes compete.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to: "1.5 Dissociation" of somatoparaphrenia for the upper limb and neglect for the lower limb following a thalamic stroke presenting as flaccid hemiparesis: rehabilitation applications and neuroscience implications.

Experimental brain research·2019
Same author

Illusory Reduplication of One's Own Body: Phenomenology and Classification of Autoscopic Phenomena.

Cognitive neuropsychiatry·2014
Same author

Dementia reversible by plasmapheresis in multiple myeloma.

Behavioural neurology·2014
Same author

Anterograde and retrograde amnesia following bitemporal infarction.

Behavioural neurology·2014
Same author

Ideomotor Apraxia in Left Thalamic Hemorrhage: Discrepancy between Clinical Course and SPECT.

Behavioural neurology·2014
Same author

Relapsing depression in paramedian thalamic infarctions.

Behavioural neurology·2014

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • The brain processes visual information differently based on its location in the visual field.
  • Affective (emotional) and recognition (identification) judgments may involve distinct neural pathways.
  • The impact of stimulus exposure duration (subliminal, liminal, supraliminal) on these processes is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how subliminal, liminal, and supraliminal visual presentations of faces and nonsense words influence subsequent affective and recognition choices.
  • To determine if these influences differ between stimulus types (faces vs. words) and visual fields.
  • To explore the relationship between affective and recognition judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Lateralized tachistoscopic presentation of faces and pronounceable nonsense words.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects made forced-choice judgments on either affective (emotional valence) or recognition (identity) tasks.
  • Varying exposure durations: subliminal (below awareness), liminal (at threshold), and supraliminal (clearly visible).
  • Main Results:

    • Subliminal presentations selectively enhanced later affective choices for faces, but not for words; recognition remained unaffected.
    • Supraliminal presentations enhanced later affective choices for words, but not for faces; recognition showed expected visual field advantages (left visual field for faces, right visual field for words).
    • Liminal presentations yielded no significant effects on either choice type.

    Conclusions:

    • Affective processing is differentially influenced by stimulus type and exposure duration, with subliminal stimuli impacting faces and supraliminal stimuli impacting words.
    • Recognition processing appears more consistent across exposure durations and visual fields.
    • Affective and recognition judgments seem to be competing processes, as only one type of judgment, not both, showed significant deviations from chance within a specific visual field and exposure condition.