Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Angle classification revisited. 1: Is current use reliable?

M I Katz1

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, Howard University College of Dentistry, Washington, D.C.

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics : Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
|August 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inadvertent intracranial placement of a nasogastric tube.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1994
Same author

Angle classification revisited 2: a modified Angle classification.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·1992
Same author

An unexpected growth pattern: considerations in management.

The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery·1992
Same author

The 100-year dilemma: what is a normal occlusion, and how is malocclusion classified?

Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)·1990
Same author

GPs and specialists: a referral system that benefits both.

Dental management·1987
Same journal

Smile frameworks defined by the patient's facial pattern: A cross-sectional study.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the correlation between dental arch width and dentofacial parameters using cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective analysis.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Patient experiences with orthodontic retention and retainers: A scoping review.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same journal

We are there for you.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Considerations concerning credit cards.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Thieves of thought: Plagiarism in scientific writing.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
See all related articles

The Angle classification system for malocclusion shows significant disagreement among orthodontists, indicating a need for improved dental classification methods. This study highlights inconsistencies in applying the Angle method to complex cases.

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Dental Morphology
  • Biomedical Classification Systems

Background:

  • The Angle classification system has been the orthodontic standard for 100 years.
  • Practitioners report difficulties applying the Angle system to malocclusions between Class II and Class III.
  • Existing classification methods may lack precision for nuanced dental presentations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the consistency of orthodontists in applying the Angle classification method.
  • To identify challenges and variations in classifying malocclusions.
  • To gather recommendations for enhancing current dental classification techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Selection of study models representing ideal, mutilated, and Class II tendency occlusions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Standardized photographic documentation of buccal views for each model.
  • Distribution of a questionnaire to 347 orthodontists to assess classification consistency.

    • Main Results:

    • A 77.8% response rate indicated strong interest in dental classification.
    • Significant disagreement was observed among orthodontists in classifying all but the ideal occlusion models.
    • Respondents provided qualitative feedback on the Angle classification system's limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • The Angle classification system demonstrates significant variability in application among orthodontists.
    • Current classification methods may not adequately address the spectrum of malocclusions.
    • There is a clear need for refined or alternative classification systems in orthodontics.