Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automation in clinical microbiology.

G L Woods1

  • 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19129.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Clinical microbiology automation enhances microbial detection, identification, and susceptibility testing, leading to faster diagnoses. While offering improved sensitivity and specificity, automated methods present higher costs and potential for mechanical failure.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efforts of the United States' National Marrow Donor Program and Registry to improve utilization and representation of minority donors.

Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)·2008
Same author

Ertapenem versus cefepime for initial empirical treatment of pneumonia acquired in skilled-care facilities or in hospitals outside the intensive care unit.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology·2006
Same author

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: data from a multicenter Intensive Care Unit Surveillance Study (ISS) in the United States.

Journal of chemotherapy (Florence, Italy)·2004
Same author

Management of complicated appendicitis and comparison of outcome with other primary sites of intra-abdominal infection: results of a trial comparing ertapenem and piperacillin-tazobactam.

Journal of chemotherapy (Florence, Italy)·2004
Same author

A rapid immunochromatographic assay for hepatitis B virus screening.

Journal of viral hepatitis·2003
Same author

Expression of the uterine Mx protein in cyclic and pregnant cows, gilts, and mares.

Journal of animal science·2003

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Microbiology
  • Medical Laboratory Science
  • Diagnostic Technology

Background:

  • Automation in clinical microbiology began in the 1960s with initial limitations.
  • Modern instruments are essential for microbial detection, identification, and susceptibility testing.
  • Automated systems are used for blood culture detection, urine screening, and antimicrobial agent assays.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the impact and evolution of automation in clinical microbiology laboratories.
  • To highlight the benefits and drawbacks of automated testing compared to manual methods.
  • To discuss the future trends and potential of automation in the field.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical and current applications of automation in clinical microbiology.
  • Comparison of automated versus manual testing in terms of speed, accuracy, and cost.
  • Discussion of emerging technologies and their potential integration.

Main Results:

  • Automation enables more rapid diagnoses and reduces subjective interpretation of results.
  • Automated tests can offer greater sensitivity and specificity than manual techniques.
  • Key applications include microbial identification, susceptibility testing, and pathogen screening.

Conclusions:

  • Automation is a vital component of modern clinical microbiology laboratories.
  • Future automation will likely incorporate advanced molecular technologies like PCR and potentially flow cytometry.
  • While cost and mechanical failure are considerations, automation's benefits in speed and accuracy are significant.

Related Experiment Videos