Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An efficient statistical procedure for interpreting DNA single locus profiling data in crime cases.

I W Evett1, J K Scranage, R Pinchin

  • 1Central Research and Support Establishment, Forensic Science Service, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom.

Journal - Forensic Science Society
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Morrison et al. (2016) Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2017
Same author

Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US-A commentary on the PCAST report.

Forensic science international·2017
Same author

The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2015
Same author

E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: report on experiences from current projects and outlook.

Forensic science international·2012
Same author

Logical evaluation of evidence when a person is suspected of committing two separate offences.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2006
Same author

The nature of forensic science opinion--a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2006
Same journal

Identification of polydimethylsiloxane lubricant traces from latex condoms in cases of sexual assault.

Journal - Forensic Science Society·1994
Same journal

An autopsy evaluation of defence wounds in 195 homicidal deaths due to stabbing.

Journal - Forensic Science Society·1994
Same journal

Extraction of high quality genomic DNA from microsamples of human blood.

Journal - Forensic Science Society·1994
Same journal

The fatalities of the Intifada (uprising): the first five years.

Journal - Forensic Science Society·1994
Same journal

The effect of relatives on the likelihood ratio associated with DNA profile evidence in criminal cases.

Journal - Forensic Science Society·1994
Same journal

Cases of fatal intoxication with Ketogan.

Journal - Forensic Science Society·1994
See all related articles

This study presents a simplified Bayesian likelihood ratio calculation for comparing DNA single locus profiles. The robust method accounts for band shift and molecular weight variations, validated by extensive experiments.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Genetics
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Accurate comparison of DNA profiles is crucial in forensic science.
  • Existing methods for calculating likelihood ratios can be complex.
  • Accounting for technical variations like band shift is essential for reliable DNA profile analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a simplified approach for calculating the Bayesian likelihood ratio for single-locus DNA profile comparisons.
  • To incorporate the effects of band shift and molecular weight variation into the calculation.
  • To demonstrate the robustness of the proposed method through experimental validation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a simplified Bayesian likelihood ratio calculation framework.
  • Inclusion of algorithms to address band shift in DNA profiles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Modeling of precision variations based on molecular weight.
  • Experimental validation using substantial DNA data collections.

    • Main Results:

    • A simplified and robust method for Bayesian likelihood ratio calculation in DNA profiling.
    • Successful accommodation of band shift and molecular weight-dependent precision variations.
    • Demonstration of method's reliability across diverse experimental datasets.

    Conclusions:

    • The simplified Bayesian likelihood ratio calculation offers a practical and robust tool for DNA profile comparison.
    • The method enhances the accuracy of forensic DNA analysis by accounting for key technical variables.
    • Experimental evidence supports the widespread applicability and reliability of this approach in forensic settings.