Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing outcome standards for quality assurance activities.

D Banta1

  • 1CMT/TNO Leiden, The Netherlands.

Quality Assurance in Health Care : the Official Journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Public health triumphs at WTO Conference.

JAMA·2001
Same author

Introduction: health technology assessment and the European Union.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2000
Same author

Health technology assessment in France.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2000
Same author

Health technology assessment in Sweden.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2000
Same author

Health technology assessment and health care in the European Union.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2000
Same author

International group of health experts issues global "declaration to stop TB".

JAMA·2000

Quality assurance programs are shifting towards outcome-based measures, incorporating health care technology assessment. Informatics can enhance quality by developing efficacy data and monitoring patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Informatics
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Historically, limited data linked healthcare processes to outcomes, hindering quality assurance (QA).
  • Advancements in health care technology assessment (HCTA) provide efficacy data, while patient satisfaction emerges as a key outcome measure.
  • Process measures in QA often lack validity and can be detrimental.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the evolving landscape of quality assurance programs.
  • To highlight the potential of health care technology assessment and informatics in improving healthcare quality.
  • To propose integrating HCTA into QA guideline development.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the development of quality assurance programs and health care technology assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the role of informatics in data collection and outcome monitoring.
  • Conceptual framework for integrating HCTA into QA.

    • Main Results:

    • Quality assurance is increasingly reliant on outcome data and validated process measures.
    • Informatics offers dual contributions: developing efficacy/safety data banks and direct outcome monitoring.
    • HCTA and QA have largely developed independently, presenting an opportunity for integration.

    Conclusions:

    • Future quality assurance programs should prioritize outcomes and rigorously validated processes.
    • Integrating health care technology assessment into QA guidelines is a constructive approach to enhance healthcare quality and patient safety.
    • Informatics is crucial for both generating evidence and monitoring quality in healthcare.