A comparison of bladder neck incision and transurethral prostatic resection

Between 1978 and 1988, 108 patients underwent bladder neck incision (BNI) for bladder outflow obstruction. These patients were compared to a similar group who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), during the same time period. Only patients with minimal prostatic enlargement (less than 10 g) with prominent bladder necks and small lateral lobes were included in the study. In addition, all patients in the resection group had a resection weight of less than 10 g on the histopathology report. Patients were followed up by means of a posted questionnaire to which 59 patients in the BNI group and 86 in the TURP group responded. Pre-operative and peri-operative data were also collected from these respondents by a retrospective case record review. This found both operations to be safe with low morbidity and mortality. BNI was better than TURP in terms of shorter operation length (P less than 0.017) and shorter duration of catheterization (P less than 0.004). No other peri-operative differences were found. Follow-up results from the questionnaire showed no significant differences in symptoms between the two groups. Similarly, there was no difference in the number of re-operations performed over the 10 year period studied. Patient assessment of their operation was initially favourable in both groups (greater than 80% patient approval) however, both treatment groups experienced a gradual drop in patient approval over the 10 year period. There were no differences in the level of approval between the BNI and TURP groups.