Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 14, 2026

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

1,4-Dioxane: prediction of in vivo clastogenicity

H S Rosenkranz1, G Klopman

  • 1Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261.

Mutation Research
|October 1, 1992
PubMed

Insights

1,4-Dioxane is not genotoxic in vitro but may induce micronuclei and cancer in vivo. Further research is needed to determine if this is due to DNA damage or a non-genotoxic mechanism.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Chemical Safety
  • Carcinogenesis

Background:

  • 1,4-Dioxane is a chemical contaminant with potential genotoxic and carcinogenic properties.
  • Understanding the structural basis of its toxicity is crucial for risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the structural basis of 1,4-dioxane's potential genotoxicity and carcinogenicity using the CASE program.
  • To predict the in vitro and in vivo effects of 1,4-dioxane.

Main Methods:

  • Computational analysis using the CASE program to assess structural alerts for toxicity.
  • Review of existing literature on 1,4-dioxane's genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.

Main Results:

  • The CASE program predicted 1,4-dioxane is not genotoxic in vitro.
  • Predictions indicated 1,4-dioxane induces micronuclei in rat bone marrow and is carcinogenic in rats and mice.
  • Potential for genotoxic action via DNA damage or non-genotoxic mechanisms was considered.

Conclusions:

  • 1,4-Dioxane's carcinogenicity and in vivo genotoxicity (micronuclei induction) warrant further investigation.
  • The mechanism of micronuclei induction may involve genotoxic DNA damage or a non-genotoxic pathway.
  • Structural analysis suggests a need to differentiate between genotoxic and non-genotoxic mechanisms for 1,4-dioxane.

More Related Videos

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface10:10

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Published on: February 23, 2020

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure08:25

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...