Defensive attribution hypothesis and serious occupational accidents
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2026

Modified Drop Tower Impact Tests for American Football Helmets
Published on: February 19, 2017
1Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract:
Based on the defensive attribution hypothesis, we assume that the victims of serious occupational accidents tend to attribute their accidents to external factors, while their coworkers and foremen tend to attribute the accidents to the victims' own action. The data to test this hypothesis consisted of 99 serious occupational accidents in southern Finland. In connection with the accident, or after the investigation at the accident site, 73 victims, 65 coworkers, and 71 foremen were interviewed. The results support our assumption, as the victims tended to use external attributions, whereas the foremen and coworkers attributed the accidents to internal factors. The defensive attribution hypothesis seems to explain the differences in how each party interpreted the basis for each accident.
More Related Videos
09:55Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
Published on: March 8, 2018
07:30A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Attribution Theory
Fundamental Attribution Error
Attribution
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Correspondence Bias