Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Severe disability. Part 2: The difficult comparison with same age probands].

H Piechowiak

    Fortschritte Der Medizin
    |July 20, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Obtaining legal rights for the severely handicapped patient. What the social security office really wants to know from you].

    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin·2000
    Same author

    [Your severely handicapped patient gains his rights. Handicapped status: tax loophole for the common man?].

    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin·2000
    Same author

    [Case management and expert assessment of work disability].

    Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2000
    Same author

    [Jubilation over low morbidity? Without elderly and ill patients absenteeism is lower...].

    Fortschritte der Medizin·1998
    Same author

    [Expert assessment of work disability--do we realize the effects?].

    Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·1997
    Same author

    ["Full shift light masonry work". Apparently a crux--social medicine epicrisis].

    Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·1996
    Same journal

    [More information--less pain. Procedure in pain following amputation of limbs. Brachial plexus injury and nerve root avulsion. Interview by Susanne Kammerer].

    Fortschritte der Medizin·1999
    Same journal

    [Galenic alternatives to unstable tocopherol acetate. "Smeared" or cheated?--Vitamin E in facial ointments].

    Fortschritte der Medizin·1999
    Same journal

    [Gene diagnosis in the hand of the physician].

    Fortschritte der Medizin·1999
    Same journal

    [Is non-toxic cancer therapy through biotechnology a possibility?].

    Fortschritte der Medizin·1999
    Same journal

    [Smoking withdrawal in practice and clinic].

    Fortschritte der Medizin·1999
    Same journal

    [The future of pancreas diagnosis. An exclusive training service of the Gastro-Ligue for dermatologists].

    Fortschritte der Medizin·1999
    See all related articles

    Legislators

    Area of Science:

    • Legal interpretation and healthcare policy analysis.
    • Examination of German social law concerning long-term care needs.
    • Analysis of medical-legal frameworks in elder care.

    Context:

    • The legal definition of
    • Schwerpflegebedürftigkeit
    • (severe care needs) presents interpretation challenges.
    • Current legal texts create practical difficulties for users seeking clear solutions.
    • Health insurance carriers hold decision-making authority, with physicians in advisory roles.

    Purpose:

    • To analyze the complexities and ambiguities in legal texts regarding severe care needs.
    • To examine the practical implications of these legal texts for healthcare providers and recipients.
    • To critique the legislative approach and associated guidelines for clarity and efficacy.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Summary:

    • Legal texts on severe care needs (Schwerpflegebedürftigkeit) create significant interpretive challenges.
    • Physicians act solely as medical advisors, while health insurance carriers make final decisions.
    • Legislative requirements for age-based comparisons are unclear and potentially nonsensical.
    • Guidelines from leading associations lack unequivocal clarity, leading to misunderstandings.

    Impact:

    • Highlights the need for clearer legal definitions and guidelines in long-term care policy.
    • Identifies aporias and misunderstandings arising from current legislation on severe care needs.
    • Suggests a critical review of decision-making processes and advisory roles within the healthcare system.