Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
Published on: September 3, 2016
Comparison of cell proliferation in breast carcinoma using image analysis (Ki-67) and flow cytometric systems
J C Kennedy1, N el-Badawy, P B DeRose
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract:
Cellular proliferation has been implicated as an important predictor of biologic behavior in breast cancer. Cellular proliferation of 95 breast carcinomas was evaluated by comparing Ki-67 immunoreactivity in frozen sections quantitated by image analysis with S-phase and S + G2/M phase fraction determined by flow cytometry on nuclei extracted from fixed, paraffin-embedded sections (modified Hedley's technique). These parameters were correlated with traditional morphologic features of histologic grade, including mitotic count. Ki-67 immunoreactivity correlated with S-phase fraction determined by flow cytometry (r = .41, P = .001) and with S + G2/M phase fraction determined by flow cytometry (r = .29, P = .008). There was also a correlation between histologic grade and Ki-67 immunoreactivity (r = .30, P = .004) and between histologic grade and S-phase fraction (r = .42, P = .0001). Mitotic count correlated with Ki-67 immunoreactivity (r = .25, P = .015) and with S-phase fraction (r = .35, P = .001). Image and flow cytometric analysis systems provide comparable measurements of cellular proliferation; their measurements correlate with histologic grade and mitotic count in breast cancer.
More Related Videos
12:34Isolation and Staining of Mouse Skin Keratinocytes for Cell Cycle Specific Analysis of Cellular Protein Expression by Mass Cytometry
Published on: May 9, 2019
11:24High-throughput Imaging and Analysis Workflow for Evaluating Skin Cell Phenotypes and Proliferation States in Tissue Samples
Published on: October 31, 2025