Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prognostic factors in clinical trials.

S Dahlberg1, P Y Liu

  • 1Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98101.

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Prognostic factors are crucial for defining patient groups and treatment strategies. Validating these factors requires prospective randomized studies, not premature use in new study designs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Efficacy of three hearing intervention strategies in microtia patients with concomitant ossicular malformation].

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi·2026
Same author

[Ongoing pregnancy rate with intervention and expectant therapy in patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion: a prospective multicenter cohort study].

Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi·2025
Same author

Concurrent Chemotherapy and Pelvic Radiation Therapy Compared With Pelvic Radiation Therapy Alone as Adjuvant Therapy After Radical Surgery in High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of the Cervix.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2023
Same author

[Application status of CFD technology in occupational hazard control].

Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases·2022
Same author

[Study on the diffusion of hydrogen fluoride in an electrolytic fluoride plant based on CFD numerical simulation method].

Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases·2022
Same author

[Analysis of prescription and rationality of anti-hypertensive medication among community health centers in Beijing].

Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi·2021

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Prognostic factors are essential for defining patient populations and guiding treatment strategies in clinical studies.
  • Accurate accounting of prognostic factors in analysis is vital for valid treatment effect estimates and cross-study comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the critical role of prognostic factors in clinical research.
  • To highlight the necessity of rigorous validation for prognostic factors before their application in study design.
  • To differentiate between the identification and validation of prognostic factors.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the principles of prospective randomized study designs for establishing causal relationships.
  • Emphasis on the limitations of retrospective analysis for validating prognostic factors.
  • Analysis of the impact of premature use of unvalidated prognostic factors on study outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Prognostic factors significantly influence study design, objectives, and treatment strategies.
  • Prospective randomized designs are the gold standard for confirming causal links between prognostic factors and endpoints.
  • Retrospective findings require prospective verification to establish validity.

Conclusions:

  • Prognostic factors must be rigorously validated using prospective methods before influencing patient selection or treatment strategies in new studies.
  • Premature application of unvalidated factors compromises the integrity and interpretability of research findings.
  • The distinction between factor discovery and factor validation is paramount for robust clinical research.

Related Experiment Videos