Related Experiment Videos
The Task Demonstration Model: a concurrent model for teaching groups of students with severe disabilities
Exceptional Children
|September 1, 1992
Summary
The Task Demonstration Model (TDM) is more effective than the Standard Prompting Hierarchy (SPH) for students with intellectual disabilities. TDM resulted in higher correct response rates and percentages, with fewer prompts needed.
Area of Science:
- Special Education
- Developmental Psychology
- Instructional Design
Background:
- Students with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities often require specialized instructional strategies.
- Traditional prompting methods may be less efficient for this population.
- Evaluating alternative instructional models is crucial for improving learning outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of the Task Demonstration Model (TDM) against the Standard Prompting Hierarchy (SPH).
- To assess the impact of these instructional models on teacher and student variables.
- To determine optimal instructional strategies for students with intellectual disabilities.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study design was employed, contrasting TDM with SPH and baseline conditions.
- Three teachers and their respective student groups participated in the study.
- Data were collected on teacher behaviors (demands, praise, prompts) and student outcomes (task engagement, percent correct, rate correct).
Main Results:
- Prompting frequency was significantly lower (12 times less) in TDM compared to SPH.
- Student task engagement was equivalent across both TDM and SPH.
- TDM showed a 10% higher percentage of correct responses and a doubled rate of correct responses compared to SPH.
Conclusions:
- The Task Demonstration Model (TDM) offers a more efficient instructional approach for students with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities.
- Reduced prompting in TDM may contribute to increased learning rates and accuracy.
- TDM presents a promising alternative to the Standard Prompting Hierarchy (SPH) for enhancing educational outcomes.