A comparison of tests for antifibrillatory action

Insights

This study identified reliable tests for antifibrillatory drug action, ranking quinidine, procaine, and others by potency. Results guide future research into antifibrillatory mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Cardiovascular Physiology

Background:

  • Antifibrillatory drugs are crucial for managing cardiac arrhythmias.
  • Standardized testing is needed to compare drug efficacy and potency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the most effective test for assessing antifibrillatory action.
  • To rank several reputed antifibrillatory drugs by potency.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments utilized isolated rabbit atria at 34°C.
  • Measurements included maximum driving frequency, conduction velocity, contractions, and thresholds for extrasystoles, flutter, and fibrillation.
  • Log dose-response curves were generated for quinidine, papaverine, procaine, dibenamine, and procaine amide.

Main Results:

  • Maximum frequency and fibrillation threshold tests yielded consistent results, establishing a drug potency order: quinidine > procaine > dibenamine > papaverine > procainamide.
  • Extrasystole and flutter thresholds showed higher variability.
  • Serpajmaline exhibited antifibrillatory activity comparable to quinidine without increasing contractile depression.

Conclusions:

  • The maximum driving frequency and fibrillation threshold tests are reliable indicators of antifibrillatory activity.
  • Drug potency varies significantly, with quinidine and procaine amide showing distinct dose-response relationships compared to other tested agents.
  • Further investigation into the mode of action of these antifibrillatory compounds is warranted.