Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

New enzyme immunoassay for detecting cryptococcal antigen.

F R Knight1

  • 1Mycological Reference Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, London.

Journal of Clinical Pathology
|September 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increasing incidence of cryptococcosis in the United Kingdom.

The Journal of infectionยท1993
See all related articles

A new enzyme immunoassay (EIA) system for cryptococcal antigen detection showed 92% agreement with the latex agglutination (LA) method. EIA offers a potentially more accurate and simpler diagnostic tool for early cryptococcal infections.

Area of Science:

  • Medical diagnostics
  • Clinical microbiology
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Cryptococcal antigen detection is crucial for diagnosing cryptococcosis.
  • Current methods like latex agglutination (LA) have limitations.
  • Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) systems offer potential improvements in diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of a new EIA system with the established LA method for cryptococcal antigen detection.
  • To evaluate the accuracy, speed, and simplicity of the EIA system.
  • To assess the potential of EIA in improving the diagnosis of early cryptococcal cases.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of a new enzyme immunoassay (EIA) system against a latex agglutination (LA) method.
  • Analysis of 54 patient samples for cryptococcal antigen.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of agreement, false positive rates, and inevaluable results between the two methods.

    • Main Results:

    • The EIA system demonstrated 92% agreement with the LA method.
    • The LA method produced one false positive result and one inevaluable sample.
    • The EIA system was found to be rapid, simple to perform, and suggested fewer false positives.

    Conclusions:

    • The new EIA system is a viable alternative to the LA method for cryptococcal antigen detection.
    • EIA may offer improved diagnostic accuracy, particularly in identifying early-stage cryptococcal infections.
    • The simplicity and speed of EIA enhance its utility in clinical settings.