Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Legal liability to volunteers in testing new drugs
Abstract:
Scientists test new drugs by giving them to volunteers. In spite of every precaution, the drug may harm the volunteer. Under Canadian law, can he recover damages against any of the persons connected with the test? He cannot succeed against the scientist if the latter had made complete disclosure of the risks and had then obtained the volunteer's free consent. Where the subject of a test is a child or one of unsound mind, the guardian's consent probably does not protect the scientist from a possible claim by the subject. Where a married woman is a volunteer, her husband's consent is unnecessary. The volunteer cannot succeed against his family physician who referred him to the scientist unless the physician took an active part in an experiment that was conducted negligently or without a proper consent. The volunteer cannot succeed against the maker unless he has negligently prepared the drug or given misleading information.
Insights
Drug trial volunteers may recover damages if harmed, provided proper consent and no negligence occurred. Legal recourse depends on disclosure, consent validity, and the roles of scientists, physicians, and drug makers.
Area of Science:
- Medical Law
- Clinical Trials
- Drug Safety
Background:
- Drug testing involves inherent risks to volunteers.
- Legal frameworks govern volunteer protection in clinical trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze Canadian legal recourse for drug trial volunteers harmed during testing.
- To determine liability of scientists, physicians, and drug manufacturers.
Main Methods:
- Legal analysis of volunteer rights under Canadian law.
- Examination of consent requirements and negligence standards.
Main Results:
- Scientists are protected if risks are disclosed and consent is obtained.
- Guardian consent may not shield scientists for minors or those of unsound mind.
- Physician and manufacturer liability depends on active negligence or misleading information.
Conclusions:
- Volunteer protection in drug trials hinges on informed consent and absence of negligence.
- Specific legal protections vary based on the role of the involved parties and the nature of the harm.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
