Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for developing, evaluating, and revising the classification of personality disorders.

W J Livesley1, D N Jackson

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

This study proposes improvements for personality disorder classification systems, focusing on development, evaluation, and modification. The goal is a scientifically rigorous and valid diagnostic framework for personality disorders.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Minimal, superficial DNA damage in human skin from filtered far-ultraviolet C.

The British journal of dermatology·2021
Same author

A feasibility study of microwave therapy for precancerous actinic keratosis.

The British journal of dermatology·2020
Same author

Group And Individual Regularities In Trait Inference: A Multidimensional Scaling Analysis.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

MULTIMETHOD FACTOR ANALYSIS: A REFORMULATION.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

The Dimensionality Of Psychopathology Descriptors.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Harry H. Harman (1913-1376).

Multivariate behavioral research·2016

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Psychology
  • Clinical Diagnosis

Background:

  • Current personality disorder classifications require refinement.
  • A need exists for a more scientifically grounded and systematically improvable diagnostic system.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a framework for developing, evaluating, and modifying personality disorder classifications.
  • To enhance the validity and reliability of personality disorder diagnoses.

Main Methods:

  • Emphasizing the importance of clearly stated underlying principles for classification.
  • Distinguishing between theoretical, measurement, and diagnostic models.
  • Focusing on content validity as a foundational step.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proposing a system for successive approximation towards a valid classification.
  • Highlighting the role of convergent and discriminant evidence in evaluation.
  • Recommending evaluation based on theoretical and measurement models.

Conclusions:

  • A robust classification system requires clear principles and rigorous validation.
  • Iterative evaluation and revision are crucial for advancing personality disorder diagnostics.
  • The proposed approach aims for a verifiable, modifiable, and scientifically testable classification.