Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Visual attention and perceptual grouping.

M B Ben-Av¹, D Sagi, J Braun

¹Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Perception & Psychophysics

|September 1, 1992

Summary

Perceptual grouping, unlike textural discontinuity detection, is impaired by concurrent visual tasks. Form identification competes for visual attention, hindering grouping performance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Segmentation, Binding, and Illusory Conjunctions.

Neural computation·2019

Same author

Teaching the Interplay Between Social Determinants of Health (SDH) and Health Outcomes: the ETGAR Student-Delivered Service.

Journal of general internal medicine·2019

Same author

Visual imagery facilitates visual perception: psychophysical evidence.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013

Same author

Visual imagery: effects of short- and long-term memory.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013

Same author

Spatial interactions in amblyopia: effects of stimulus parameters and amblyopia type.

Vision research·2005

Same author

Long-lasting, long-range detection facilitation.

Vision research·2002

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Visual Perception

Background:

Perceptual organization relies on textural discontinuities and perceptual grouping.
Previous research indicated textural discontinuity detection is attention-independent.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the impact of concurrent visual tasks on perceptual grouping.
To determine if perceptual grouping competes for visual attention.

Main Methods:

Gestalt principles (proximity, similarity) were used to elicit perceptual grouping.
Participants performed grouping tasks concurrently with a central form identification task.
Textural discontinuity detection served as a control task.

Main Results:

Concurrent form identification significantly reduced performance on all perceptual grouping tasks.
No performance decrement was observed for textural discontinuity detection when paired with form identification.

Conclusions:

Perceptual grouping and form identification compete for limited visual attention resources.
Textural discontinuity detection appears to be an automatic process, unaffected by attentional load.

Related Experiment Videos