Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect.

E Hiris1, R Blake

  • 1Department of Psychology/Vision Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is there a difference in pressures and forces under the roller with different pads when lunging horses with the Pessoa training aid?

Journal of equine veterinary science·2026
Same author

Use of a spot-check protocol to measure ventricular response rate in dogs with atrial fibrillation.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2025
Same author

Use of the subcostal view for obtaining aortic spectral Doppler-derived outflow velocities in cats.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2025
Same author

Tight nosebands apply high pressures on the horses' face and alter stride kinematics.

Journal of equine veterinary science·2025
Same author

Sustained perceptual invisibility of solid shapes following contour adaptation to partial outlines.

Consciousness and cognition·2014
Same author

Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations.

Journal of vision·2009
Same journal

Tau protein as a regulator of mitochondrial function and dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

A scalable, dividing cell model for the robust propagation and quantification of human sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Epigenetic regulation of mesenchymal BMP signaling directs postnatal organ innervation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Single-shot wide-field biochemical imaging at 1 kHz frame rate.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Morphogenesis and topological evolution of a frustrated nematic liquid crystal under confinement.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

B cell-intrinsic CXCR3 drives efficient generation of ectopic pulmonary germinal center responses to influenza A virus infection.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Visual motion aftereffects (MAEs) differ based on static versus dynamic displays after motion adaptation. Dynamic MAEs mimic real motion, unlike static MAEs, suggesting distinct neural processing for motion perception.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Vision Science
  • Perceptual Psychology

Background:

  • Prolonged exposure to visual motion induces motion aftereffects (MAEs).
  • Traditional explanations of MAEs often assume uniform neural processing regardless of display type.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differences in MAEs generated by static versus dynamic test displays after motion adaptation.
  • To determine if the neural mechanisms underlying MAEs are differentially affected by static and dynamic stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Participants underwent prolonged adaptation to motion in a specific direction.
  • Visual motion aftereffects were measured using both static and dynamic test displays.
  • The influence of motion direction bandwidth during adaptation on MAE magnitude was assessed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Dynamic MAEs were precisely simulated by real motion, while static MAEs were not.
  • The magnitude of dynamic MAEs varied with the bandwidth of adapted motion directions.
  • Static MAEs showed no dependence on the bandwidth of motion directions during adaptation.

Conclusions:

  • Stationary patterns do not directly engage the neural mechanisms affected by motion adaptation.
  • Dynamic visual displays directly activate neural mechanisms involved in motion perception.
  • Existing models of MAEs require revision to account for the differential processing of static and dynamic stimuli.