Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why discrepancies exist between structured diagnostic interviews and clinicians' diagnoses.

V Kovess1, O Sylla, L Fournier

  • 1Psychosocial Research Unit, Douglas Hospital, Verdun, McGill University, Montreal.

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
|August 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Circulating Biomarkers in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Everolimus in the Pre-nephrectomy Setting.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2022
Same author

[Xerodermapigmentosum: Challenge of diagnosis in West Africa].

Le Mali medical·2022
Same author

First cases of Omicron in France are exhibiting mild symptoms, November 2021-January 2022.

Infectious diseases now·2022
Same author

[Epithelial ovarian cancers and minimally invasive cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review].

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie·2021
Same author

[Anatomical and functional imaging for radiotherapy planning].

Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique·2020
Same author

Variation in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as predictor of outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients treated with nivolumab.

Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII·2020

Diagnostic discrepancies between clinicians and epidemiologists stem from unclear diagnostic criteria and complex cases. Utilizing structured interviews like the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) may improve diagnostic accuracy in mental health research.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Epidemiology
  • Mental Health Diagnostics

Background:

  • Discrepancies exist between clinical diagnoses and epidemiological case findings within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) and Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) framework.
  • Understanding these diagnostic inconsistencies is crucial for accurate mental health research and clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the causes of discrepancies in diagnosing mental health "cases" between clinicians and epidemiologists using the DSM-III/DIS system.
  • To identify specific factors contributing to diagnostic disagreements in a general population sample.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical study involving 139 interviews conducted by four interviewers using the DIS.
  • Psychiatrists independently completed DSM-III checklists and could ask additional questions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inter-rater reliability was assessed using kappa statistics, with all values exceeding 0.58.

    • Main Results:

    • Ambiguities within the DSM-III criteria, particularly regarding unspecified reference periods, were a significant source of diagnostic discrepancies.
    • Complex cases, including overlapping symptoms for different diagnoses or multiple diagnoses, and differences in data collection methods (structured DIS vs. flexible clinical judgment) contributed to disagreements.
    • Clinicians' ability to use volunteered comments contrasted with interviewers' adherence to a strict schedule, further explaining variations.

    Conclusions:

    • DSM-III ambiguities and lack of specified reference periods are key drivers of diagnostic discrepancies.
    • Case complexity and methodological differences between structured interviews and clinical judgment contribute to diagnostic variability.
    • Alternative diagnostic instruments, such as the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for anxiety and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Affective Disorders (DISSA) for depression, show potential for enhancing the performance of diagnostic interviews.