Determination of salivary digoxin with a dry strip immunometric assay

Analysis of salivary digoxin using a rapid dry chemistry, enzyme-labeled immunometric assay (ELIA) was compared with fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). Saliva and serum samples were obtained from 40 hospitalized patients who were taking digoxin chronically and from 8 patients just prior to treatment with digoxin. Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 20 patients; however, saliva volumes from 10 pediatric patients were inadequate to permit analysis by FPIA, and 1 other had unmeasurable concentrations by both methods. Stimulated saliva was collected by having patients chew a small piece of Parafilm for 1-2 min. Salivary digoxin was analyzed using the same procedure recommended for serum digoxin by each manufacturer. There were no significant differences found between ELIA and FPIA determinations of unstimulated or stimulated salivary digoxin, serum digoxin, or saliva/serum concentration ratios. The saliva/serum ratio of the unstimulated group was approximately twice that of the stimulated group (p less than 0.01) by both methods, suggesting that salivary digoxin concentration decreases with increased saliva production rate. Excellent correlations were found between ELIA and FPIA salivary digoxin concentrations and between stimulated saliva and serum concentrations by both assays. Weaker correlations were observed between unstimulated saliva and serum concentrations. There was no evidence of assay interference with either method in eight nondigitalized patients, each taking an average of 6.5 medications. The ELIA appears to provide equivalent results compared with the FPIA for the determination of salivary digoxin concentration. Further investigations are needed before salivary digoxin concentration monitoring can be recommended as an acceptable alternative to serum monitoring.