Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

"Effortless" texture segmentation and "parallel" visual search are not the same thing.

J M Wolfe1

  • 1Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Boston, MA 02115.

Vision Research
|April 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparable prediction of breast cancer risk from a glimpse or a first impression of a mammogram.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2021
Same author

Dating phototrophic microbial lineages with reticulate gene histories.

Geobiology·2018
Same author

Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

The Effect of Early Postnatal Injection of Testosterone Propionate on the Structure of the Anterior Hypophysis of Male and Female Rats.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·2011
Same author

A fourth cell type in the anterior hypophysis of the dog.

The Anatomical record·2010
Same author

A cytological study of the anterior hypophysis of the dog with particular reference to the presence of a fourth cell type.

The Anatomical record·2010
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Preattentive texture segmentation and parallel visual search are not equivalent measures of visual processing. Demonstrations show that parallel processing can occur without effortless texture segmentation, and vice versa.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Preattentive texture segmentation and parallel visual search are often considered equivalent indicators of parallel processing in the visual system.
  • This assumption suggests a single, unified stage of parallel visual computation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether preattentive texture segmentation and parallel visual search are indeed equivalent measures of parallel visual processing.
  • To demonstrate that these two phenomena can dissociate.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing visual stimuli designed to test texture segmentation and visual search.
  • Analyzing the conditions under which effortless texture segmentation occurs.
  • Measuring search times in visual search tasks with varying numbers of distractors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that parallel processing can occur in visual search tasks even when stimuli do not support effortless texture segmentation.
  • Showcased instances where effortless texture segmentation was present, but visual search did not exhibit parallel characteristics.
  • Provided evidence against the equivalence of these two measures.

Conclusions:

  • Preattentive texture segmentation and parallel visual search are not interchangeable metrics for parallel visual processing.
  • The visual system employs distinct mechanisms for texture segmentation and visual search, which can operate independently.
  • These findings necessitate a revision of models assuming a single parallel processing stage for both phenomena.