Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Should be biologic marker be sensitive and specific?

J I Nurnberger1

  • 1Institute of Psychiatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202-4887.

Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
|July 11, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Parental but not child reports of affective lability in offspring predict conversion to bipolar disorder in youth at increased genetic risk.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

Genome-wide association study identifies a novel locus for cannabis dependence.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Genome-wide association study of borderline personality disorder reveals genetic overlap with bipolar disorder, major depression and schizophrenia.

Translational psychiatry·2017
Same author

Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Interhemispheric white matter integrity in young people with bipolar disorder and at high genetic risk.

Psychological medicine·2016
Same author

Genome-wide association data suggest ABCB1 and immune-related gene sets may be involved in adult antisocial behavior.

Translational psychiatry·2015
Same journal

AI-Associated Psychotic Phenomena: Collect Before You Classify.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
Same journal

Developmental Trauma as a Prognostic Factor for Later Psychotic Disorder in an Adolescent Clinical Cohort: A 20-Year Follow Up Study.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
Same journal

The Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
Same journal

Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and the Associated Risk of Hospitalisation in Bipolar Disorder, From a Nationwide Cohort, 2009-2024.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
Same journal

Benzodiazepine Use and Mortality Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study on New Benzodiazepine Users With a 5-Year Follow-Up.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
Same journal

Leveraging Family Genetic Risk Scores to Understand the Etiology of Suicidal Behaviors and Their Associations With Psychiatric Disorders.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
See all related articles

Biologic markers in psychiatry require careful evaluation. While diagnostic and linkage markers have specific uses, pathophysiologic markers are valuable research tools but may lack sensitivity and specificity for clinical diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatric research
  • Biomarker discovery
  • Clinical diagnostics

Background:

  • Biologic markers in psychiatry are frequently assessed for sensitivity and specificity.
  • Clinical psychiatric diagnoses may represent heterogeneous pathophysiologies, complicating marker interpretation.
  • The utility of markers depends on their intended application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between types of biologic markers in psychiatry.
  • To evaluate the appropriateness of sensitivity and specificity testing for psychiatric markers.
  • To clarify the role of pathophysiologic markers in current psychiatric research.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of marker types and their applications.
  • Discussion of the limitations of sensitivity and specificity in psychiatric diagnosis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Distinction between diagnostic, linkage, and pathophysiologic markers.

    • Main Results:

    • Diagnostic markers are useful for clinical pathology.
    • Linkage markers identify genetic locations.
    • Pathophysiologic markers are primarily research tools and may not align with clinical diagnoses.

    Conclusions:

    • Pathophysiologic markers are most valuable for research in contemporary psychiatry.
    • Sensitivity and specificity may be inappropriate metrics for markers not directly tied to a singular pathophysiology.
    • Careful consideration of marker type is crucial for appropriate application in psychiatric research and diagnostics.