Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Glove perforations in ophthalmic surgery.

P Prendiville1, P J McDonnell, P P Lee

  • 1Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA 90033.

American Journal of Ophthalmology
|October 15, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Ophthalmic surgery glove perforation rates reveal a low risk for surgeons but a higher risk for assistants, scrub nurses, and circulating nurses, indicating potential parenteral exposure concerns for non-surgeon staff.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety, tolerability, and acceptability of <i>Lactobacillus crispatus</i> CTV-05 (LACTIN-V) in pregnant women at high-risk of preterm birth.

Beneficial microbes·2023
Same author

A dynamical model of oncotripsy by mechanical cell fatigue: selective cancer cell ablation by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2020
Same author

Methods for Use of Peptide-MHCTetramers in Tumor Immunology.

Methods in molecular medicine·2012
Same author

Fractal dimension evaluation of cone beam computed tomography in patients with bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2011
Same author

NK cells are dysfunctional in human chronic myelogenous leukemia before and on imatinib treatment and in BCR-ABL-positive mice.

Leukemia·2011
Same author

Prevention of vaginal SHIV transmission in macaques by a live recombinant Lactobacillus.

Mucosal immunology·2011

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgical Safety
  • Infection Control

Background:

  • Intraoperative glove perforation during ophthalmic surgery poses a risk of parenteral exposure for surgical teams and patients.
  • Understanding perforation rates across different surgical roles is crucial for assessing and mitigating this risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the incidence of glove perforation in ophthalmic surgery.
  • To compare perforation rates among surgeons, assistants, scrub nurses, and circulating nurses.
  • To identify roles with a higher risk of exposure due to glove integrity issues.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of gloves collected from all surgical team members after 125 ophthalmic procedures.
  • Statistical comparison of glove perforation rates between different surgical personnel.
  • Evaluation of perforation rates relative to surgery duration and procedure type.

Main Results:

  • Surgeons exhibited a significantly lower glove perforation rate (0.3%) compared to assistants (5%), scrub nurses (16%), and circulating nurses (15%).
  • Assistants also showed a significantly lower perforation rate than scrub and circulating nurses.
  • No significant difference in perforations was found based on surgery duration or type.

Conclusions:

  • The risk of parenteral exposure from glove perforation during ophthalmic surgery is minimal for the surgeon.
  • Assistants, scrub nurses, and circulating nurses face a substantially higher risk of exposure.
  • Further research is needed to evaluate safety precautions and inform policy development for enhanced surgical safety.

Related Experiment Videos