Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Psychopathology, hypnotizability, and dissociation.

E J Frischholz1, L S Lipman, B G Braun

  • 1Dissociative Disorders Program, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

The American Journal of Psychiatry
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Patients with dissociative disorders exhibit higher hypnotizability than other psychiatric groups. This finding suggests hypnotizability assessment may aid in diagnosing dissociative disorders.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

1998-1999 MSNJ president: R. Gregory Sachs the New Jersey Medicine interview. Interview by Bill Berlin.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·2005
Same author

Automated external defibrillators and sudden cardiac arrest.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·2001
Same author

Introduction to the special section: hypnosis and EMDR. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing.

The American journal of clinical hypnosis·2001
Same author

Different perspectives on informed consent and clinical hypnosis.

The American journal of clinical hypnosis·2001
Same author

Significant dates in the history of forensic hypnosis.

The American journal of clinical hypnosis·2000
Same author

Kenneth S. Bowers, interactionism and hypnosis.

The American journal of clinical hypnosis·1998

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychiatry
  • Clinical Neuroscience

Background:

  • Hypnotizability varies across different clinical populations.
  • Previous research indicates potential differences in hypnotic susceptibility among psychiatric groups.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To replicate and extend prior research on hypnotizability in distinct clinical groups.
  • To investigate differential hypnotizability across patients with dissociative, schizophrenia, mood, and anxiety disorders compared to a normal control group.
  • To assess the utility of various hypnotizability measures in differentiating these groups.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative study involving four psychiatric groups and one normal control group.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of hypnotizability using the Hypnotic Induction Profile (eye roll sign, induction score), Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale (Form C), and self-ratings.
  • Statistical analysis to compare hypnotizability scores across groups.

    • Main Results:

    • Patients with dissociative disorders demonstrated significantly higher hypnotizability across all measures compared to all other groups.
    • Schizophrenia patients showed significantly lower hypnotizability scores on specific measures (eye roll sign, induction score) than controls.
    • Intercorrelations between hypnotizability measures were consistent across normal and combined patient groups.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support the hypothesis that dissociative disorder patients possess higher hypnotizability.
    • Results suggest that routine hypnotizability assessment could be a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis of dissociative disorders.
    • Further research may explore the neurobiological underpinnings of these observed differences in hypnotizability.