Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Risk analysis of operative intervention for failed coronary angioplasty
A M Borkon1, T L Failing, J M Piehler
1Mid America Heart Institute, St. Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri.
Insights
Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) significantly increases risks. Patients face higher mortality, longer hospital stays, and more complications compared to elective CABG.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is a common intervention for coronary artery disease.
- Failure of PTCA can necessitate urgent surgical revascularization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) following failed PTCA.
- To compare these outcomes against a matched cohort undergoing elective CABG.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 91 patients undergoing emergency CABG post-PTCA failure.
- Comparison with 91 concurrently matched patients undergoing elective CABG.
- Analysis of mortality, hospital stay, blood product use, and myocardial infarction.
Main Results:
- Emergency CABG patients had significantly higher operative mortality (12.1% vs 1%, p=0.007).
- Increased need for inotropes, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, and blood products in the emergency group.
- Higher rates of prolonged hospital stay, postoperative myocardial infarction, and ventricular arrhythmias in emergency CABG patients.
Conclusions:
- Emergency CABG after failed PTCA is associated with substantially increased risks of complications and death.
- Despite advancements, urgent CABG following PTCA failure remains a high-risk procedure.
- Multivessel disease or reperfusion catheter use did not alter clinical outcomes in this cohort.
Abstract:
To assess the outcome of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 91 patients undergoing emergency CABG after failed PTCA over a 30-month period ending July 31, 1991, were studied. For reference, a cohort of patients (91) concurrently undergoing elective CABG equally matched for age, sex, number of grafts, ventricular function, and reoperative status was compared. Specific outcomes including death, hospital length of stay, use of blood products, and development of myocardial infarction were analyzed. More than half the patients undergoing emergency CABG for failed PTCA required three or more grafts. Operative mortality was 12.1% (11/99) for emergency CABG compared with 1% (1/91) for elective case-matched CABG patients (p = 0.007). Emergency CABG patients required frequent use of postoperative inotropes (p = 0.02) and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (p = 0.001). Length of hospital stay (p = 0.005), administration of blood products (p = 0.009), postoperative myocardial infarction (p = 0.0005), and ventricular arrhythmias (p = 0.0004) were increased after emergency compared with elective CABG. The presence of multivessel disease or use of a reperfusion catheter had no influence on clinical outcome. Despite accumulated experience and improved operative management, patients requiring emergency CABG for failed PTCA remain at increased risk for postoperative complications and death.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management